It is not just the clever memes and Twitter trolling, or the violence against alt-right people peaceably expressing their opinions or even the Youtube videos or Gab conversations. I think a lot of it has to do with the general sense of growing anger at the barrage of crap being dumped on White people in this country. For example...
Exhibit A, the trailer for the new Netflix black revenge porn series "Dear White People". The video is very brief but in that short time is incredibly offensive for the stereotypes of White people, who apparently all live in opulent fraternity houses and wear blackface paint and appropriate black "culture". You will note that in the video you see a horde of blacks storming a White frat house, pushing White kids around and destroying their property. Is that the message being sent to Whites, don't make the blacks angry or offend them or even just be yourselves or you might find a crowd of blacks breaking into your home and pushing you around and breaking your stuff? The backlash against the video is pretty severe, threatening to send it into serious competition with the Ghostbusters remake for most disliked video in history. Since I saw it this morning at around 82,000 dislikes it has climbed to over 105,000 dislikes and is still climbing. Nice marketing Netflix!
Exhibit B, I posted earlier about neo-con Bill Kristol cavalierly suggesting that the solution to the problems in the White working class is to simply replace them, like with Mexicans who really want to work hard and create a better life for their kids. Makes perfect sense to me, clearly no one in the White working class actually works hard or wants a better life for our kids. We all just sit around "cutting coupons" in between taking hits of prescription painkillers or meth. For Kristol the American people, specifically the very people who created and sustained this nation, built our cities, defeated the Nazis and Imperial Japan, sent a man to the moon, etc., are nothing more than replaceable economic units of production. I happen to think they are people who deserve more than to be cast aside for Mexicans.
Exhibit C, Under-Armour is going to invest $5.5. billion in majority black hellhole/shooting gallery Baltimore but that plan is called "white supremacy". Yes, trying to invest money in a city that is majority black and crime-ridden (funny how those go together), a plan that will create all sorts of jobs for construction, on-going employment and additional jobs in restaurants and other industries that spring up where other jobs exist, is nothing but the Man keeping the brothers down by...providing gainful employment. Obviously this is just a ploy to get blacks to work at real jobs instead of shooting each other while waiting for a reparation check.
Exhibit D, the Hispanic woman governor of New Mexico, Susana Martinzez the only female Hispanic governor in America, is called a racist by a scrawny beta-male "white" liberal because she supports making it more difficult for people in this country illegally to get a driver's license in New Mexico. Clearly an effete White guy knows more about the Hispanic experience in America than Governor Martinez who obviously doesn't know anything about being Mexican-American: "She is a former Democrat and grew up in a Mexican-American household near the U.S.-Mexico border.". As a spokesperson for the Governor pointed out "...the overwhelming majority of Hispanics in New Mexico supported her initiative to end the dangerous practice of giving driver's licenses to illegal immigrants". Obviously those majority of Hispanics who support this policy are also racists. What would we do without milquetoast guilty White liberals to tell us what to think?
That is just a brief survey of a couple of items in the news from the last day or so. We are bombarded with this crap all day, every day and I see more and more people who are just sick and tired of it. If trying to invest in a city that desperately needs investment is White supremacy and if entertainment companies think putting forth black violence revenge porn is what consumers want to watch, is it any wonder more and more people are finally so sick of the narrative that they are giving the alt-right and other race realists a fair hearing and realizing that what we say makes a lot of sense?
Please keep it up Netflix and Bill Kristol. You are doing a lot of the hardest work for us.
Thursday, February 9, 2017
White working class? Just replace 'em!
In one of those examples of why in a world where every person carries a recording device and the internet allows those recordings to be broadcast to the world instantaneously you need to watch what you say, Jewish neo-con Bill Kristol opined that the White working class is kind of struggling but that is probably because they are lazy and just into hanging on by clipping coupons, which Kristol seems to think is a sign of decadence and decay rather than being frugal. In fact the White working class are so worthless and failing to contribute that it would be best to just get rid of them and replace them with Mexicans, as if the American people are nothing more than economic units that can be interchangeable and as if new waves of White immigrants 100 years ago are the same thing as waves of Mexican immigrants today. White people not working as much as you want? Get rid of them and replace them with Mexicans. Whatever you need to do to keep the worker bees working. As quoted from American Renaissance:
Bill seems to have a pretty low opinion of White people but if someone were to suggest that since the Jews are struggling with terrorism in Israel maybe we should just replace them with Palestinians, you can imagine the cries of anti-Semitism and the invocation of the Holocaust. For the record, I am not recommending replacing Jews with Palestinians.
Maybe for people like Bill Kristol, Whites are just another cog in the machine that can be replaced and have America keep chugging along as before. What he doesn't seem to understand is that you cannot replace the people and the culture that made America a nation where he and his family have become rich and influential with a different culture and expect things to go on as they were before. There is a reason Mexicans keep leaving Mexico, they don't like living somewhere that Mexicans dominate. There is nothing magical about the soil on this side of the Rio Grande that will make Mexicans who move here suddenly turn into the Founding Fathers. Instead it is more likely that the more Mexicans move here, the more America will look like Mexico which is precisely the place Mexicans seem to want to get away from. The same is true with Muslim "refugees", the more you bring into America, the more those parts of America where they live will start to look like the places they fled from. We already see this in Europe but that doesn't stop people in this country from pretending that passing through customs in an American airport makes people magically adopt American values.
It seems to me more likely that Kristol sees the White working class backlash against the Washington establishment, and by proxy the Jewish neo-con power brokers who are out of power, as a betrayal of his idea of the Republican party of endless interventions in the Middle East. The nomination and election of Trump was in a part a giant middle finger being given to the neo-con establishment and so those White working class voters who elected a Republican need to being eradicated and replaced because the unspoken flip side of his replacement equation is that in order to replace the White working class you need to not only bring in Mexicans to increase their numbers, you need to reduce the White working class population. Thanks to low birth-rates, higher incidences of White births out of wedlock, mixed race babies replacing White babies and the drug and suicide epidemic that plagues White working class communities, that part of Kriston's Final Solution for Whites is on the right path.
Instead of replacing the White working class with Mexicans and Muslim "refugees", maybe we should try to adopt policies in this country that encourage and revitalize White working class communities, starting with immigration reform, closing the borders and reducing the number of people we bring here to replace White workers. Stop providing incentives for the White working class to emulate the black underclass in joblessness and social pathology. It will take time but the people of America, those same White working class people Kristol wants to get rid of, are what built this country and made it great in the first place. Suggesting that we can just replace them when they become inconvenient is exactly why Trump was elected in the first place and why people stopped listening to Jewish neo-cons. Trump for all of his faults and foibles has the interests of the White working class as a top priority. Kristol and his ilk don't. It really is just as simple as that.
Look, to be totally honest, if things are so bad as you say with the white working class, don’t you want to get new Americans in? Seriously, you can make the case—this is going on too long and this is too crazy, probably, and I hope this thing isn’t being videotaped or ever shown anywhere. Whatever tiny, pathetic future I have is going to totally collapse.Here is the clip which I am sure AEI would love to get removed from Youtube:
Bill seems to have a pretty low opinion of White people but if someone were to suggest that since the Jews are struggling with terrorism in Israel maybe we should just replace them with Palestinians, you can imagine the cries of anti-Semitism and the invocation of the Holocaust. For the record, I am not recommending replacing Jews with Palestinians.
Maybe for people like Bill Kristol, Whites are just another cog in the machine that can be replaced and have America keep chugging along as before. What he doesn't seem to understand is that you cannot replace the people and the culture that made America a nation where he and his family have become rich and influential with a different culture and expect things to go on as they were before. There is a reason Mexicans keep leaving Mexico, they don't like living somewhere that Mexicans dominate. There is nothing magical about the soil on this side of the Rio Grande that will make Mexicans who move here suddenly turn into the Founding Fathers. Instead it is more likely that the more Mexicans move here, the more America will look like Mexico which is precisely the place Mexicans seem to want to get away from. The same is true with Muslim "refugees", the more you bring into America, the more those parts of America where they live will start to look like the places they fled from. We already see this in Europe but that doesn't stop people in this country from pretending that passing through customs in an American airport makes people magically adopt American values.
It seems to me more likely that Kristol sees the White working class backlash against the Washington establishment, and by proxy the Jewish neo-con power brokers who are out of power, as a betrayal of his idea of the Republican party of endless interventions in the Middle East. The nomination and election of Trump was in a part a giant middle finger being given to the neo-con establishment and so those White working class voters who elected a Republican need to being eradicated and replaced because the unspoken flip side of his replacement equation is that in order to replace the White working class you need to not only bring in Mexicans to increase their numbers, you need to reduce the White working class population. Thanks to low birth-rates, higher incidences of White births out of wedlock, mixed race babies replacing White babies and the drug and suicide epidemic that plagues White working class communities, that part of Kriston's Final Solution for Whites is on the right path.
Instead of replacing the White working class with Mexicans and Muslim "refugees", maybe we should try to adopt policies in this country that encourage and revitalize White working class communities, starting with immigration reform, closing the borders and reducing the number of people we bring here to replace White workers. Stop providing incentives for the White working class to emulate the black underclass in joblessness and social pathology. It will take time but the people of America, those same White working class people Kristol wants to get rid of, are what built this country and made it great in the first place. Suggesting that we can just replace them when they become inconvenient is exactly why Trump was elected in the first place and why people stopped listening to Jewish neo-cons. Trump for all of his faults and foibles has the interests of the White working class as a top priority. Kristol and his ilk don't. It really is just as simple as that.
Thursday, February 2, 2017
Glenn Beck Is An Entertainer, Not A Serious Thinker Nor A Friend of Liberty
It kills me that some people who think of themselves as "conservative" and lovers of liberty still listen to moonbat Glenn Beck as if he is on our team. Let's be clear, the only team Beck is on is Team Enrich Glenn Beck. He is a more than slightly deranged member of a cult who sells his voice and for some reason people take him seriously. Exhibit A, Beck's response to the riot last night at Berkeley:
Right. I defend Milo's right to speak but I also draw a moral equivalence between his speech that people don't like and rioters who burn stuff, pepper spray girls and beat people unconscious. Notice the words he used again: Rioters on left just as bad. How does someone who commits criminal acts of vandalism and violence that could have killed people only qualify as "just as bad"?
Here is a hint for self-proclaimed Constitutional expert Glenn Beck: free speech and free expression is expressly protected in the Constitution. Criminal vandalism and violence against people you disagree with is not. That isn't really that hard to understand if you have a middle-school level reading comprehension.
I don't have any particular affinity for Milo. Like I have said, he is occasionally amusing, he is provocative and he makes the right people mad but he is hardly a leader of the alt-right. However I have even less affinity for Glenn Beck, a lunatic snake-oil salesman who says whatever the political winds that are blowing on any given day in order to sell ad space on his radio show, memberships for his website and of course his books that I am pretty sure are mostly written by other people.
If you consider yourself a serious thinker and a defender of liberty but you still listen to Beck, you don't understand those terms,
I have already defended Milos right to speak.But be clear on who he is.:Alt-right mouthpiece who promotes chaos. Rioters on left just as bad— Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) February 2, 2017
Right. I defend Milo's right to speak but I also draw a moral equivalence between his speech that people don't like and rioters who burn stuff, pepper spray girls and beat people unconscious. Notice the words he used again: Rioters on left just as bad. How does someone who commits criminal acts of vandalism and violence that could have killed people only qualify as "just as bad"?
Here is a hint for self-proclaimed Constitutional expert Glenn Beck: free speech and free expression is expressly protected in the Constitution. Criminal vandalism and violence against people you disagree with is not. That isn't really that hard to understand if you have a middle-school level reading comprehension.
I don't have any particular affinity for Milo. Like I have said, he is occasionally amusing, he is provocative and he makes the right people mad but he is hardly a leader of the alt-right. However I have even less affinity for Glenn Beck, a lunatic snake-oil salesman who says whatever the political winds that are blowing on any given day in order to sell ad space on his radio show, memberships for his website and of course his books that I am pretty sure are mostly written by other people.
If you consider yourself a serious thinker and a defender of liberty but you still listen to Beck, you don't understand those terms,
Wednesday, February 1, 2017
If You Drink Budweiser
A) You should be ashamed of yourself because it is terrible and probably tastes better after it has passed through your urinary tract.
B) You should stop because clearly Anheuser-Busch thinks that selling crappy, cheap beer gives it license to smack you in the face with their clumsy virtue signaling.
Check out this silly Budweiser ad that is about a subtle as a jackhammer.
Didja get that subtle message? Oh, see if Trump had been President, Adolphus Busch wouldn't have been able to come to America and we would be forced to drink monkey urine instead of "The King of Beers". Of course Busch came here in 1857 and came here legally and was not from a nation that was known for fomenting terrorism. So other than that, it is just like the current debate over illegal aliens and a temporary freeze on "refugees". Does A-B think that the people who drink Budweiser, who probably voted overwhelmingly for Trump, are going to appreciate the suggestion in this video that they are terrible people?
If you want to drink a beer that is not so concerned with virtue signaling and clumsy appeals to the coastal elites that wouldn't be caught dead drinking their "beer" anyway, try Yuengling which got all sorts of crap for an endorsement of Trump last fall.
The King of Beers. What a joke.
B) You should stop because clearly Anheuser-Busch thinks that selling crappy, cheap beer gives it license to smack you in the face with their clumsy virtue signaling.
Check out this silly Budweiser ad that is about a subtle as a jackhammer.
Didja get that subtle message? Oh, see if Trump had been President, Adolphus Busch wouldn't have been able to come to America and we would be forced to drink monkey urine instead of "The King of Beers". Of course Busch came here in 1857 and came here legally and was not from a nation that was known for fomenting terrorism. So other than that, it is just like the current debate over illegal aliens and a temporary freeze on "refugees". Does A-B think that the people who drink Budweiser, who probably voted overwhelmingly for Trump, are going to appreciate the suggestion in this video that they are terrible people?
If you want to drink a beer that is not so concerned with virtue signaling and clumsy appeals to the coastal elites that wouldn't be caught dead drinking their "beer" anyway, try Yuengling which got all sorts of crap for an endorsement of Trump last fall.
The King of Beers. What a joke.
Immigration and Self-Destruction
It is generally the case that on any given topic from abortion to the merit of using fabric softener, the Left in this country can be counted on to respond to any and all issues with a toxic mixture of a complete lack of logic, jaw-dropping stupidity and tearful hysteria. Actually, scratch the word "generally", there are no known exceptions to this statement.
The latest case in point, skipping for the nonce the nomination last night of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court which is causing all sorts of overwrought reactions, is the very reasonable and probably far too lenient and temporary restriction on travel to the U.S. from states that are known hotbeds of anti-Western terrorism and the general chaos that accompanies Islam, especially where it is found without the slightly civilizing influence of lots of oil money. The wailing and crying from people like life-long Jewish politician Chuck Schumer, who seems oblivious to the fact that the people he wants to import into America in massive numbers also hate his guts for being a Jew and many would gladly toss him off of a building, is silly and wildly ignorant. I have found very, very few people on social media, even from normally thoughtful if misguided people, that have taken the time to think through these questions at even the most basic level. Let me throw a little something out there....
In general the refugees and illegal immigrant laborers of this world come from either Muslim countries or countries that are predominantly black or Hispanic. You probably have noticed that at the present no one is talking about building a wall to keep Canadians from crossing our borders, although given the idiot who is Prime Minister currently that might be a topic for the future. The simple fact that refugees and illegal aliens come almost exclusively from nations that share one or both of those attributes is without question. That brings us to the next point. There must be something about those nations that generates so many refugees and illegal aliens. This is where the liberal mind breaks down. They simply cannot take that next step. "We need to help the black and brown refugees" is where they stop without ever wondering why all of the refugees are black and brown in the first place.
The second point is that almost all of these refugees who are able to do so are heading for countries that also share some common characteristics. They tend to head for countries that are, or at least used to be, predominantly White and at least nominally Christian. Countries like the U.S., Germany, England, Sweden, etc. share a common heritage and offer the refugee and illegal alien a wealth of advantages over other nations that demographically and culturally are similar to what they are trying to flee from.
In other words, people from black and brown and/or Muslim dominated nations are desperately trying to leave the company of other people who look and/or believe like they do and go to countries where people don't look and don't believe as they do. The culture is different, the religion is different, even the climate is different and yet you still have Somalians moving to tropical paradises like Columbus, Ohio and Minneapolis.
What is up with that? Either one of two possibilities must be in play here. Either they are heading for these countries under false pretenses in order to wage jihad, which many of them clearly are, or there are fleeing their own nations and the company of their own people because being in a nation that is White and nominally Christian beats being in a country that is black or brown and/or Muslim.
Here comes the next leap. If there are valid reasons for wanting to go from one culture and move at great risk to another culture, it means that the receiving culture is superior in some ways, enough so that leaving your homeland is worth it. Saying something like that is absolutely forbidden in our "enlightened" society but that doesn't make it less true. They aren't trying to come to America because they think their lives will be worse here but because they think their lives will be better and that is because the make-up and culture of America and Europe is better than the same in Africa, the Middle-East, Mexico, Cuba, etc. People don't flee Somalia to go to Yemen. They don't leave Mexico to go to Columbia. They leave nations that are full of people like themselves to go to nations full of people not like themselves because the people not like themselves have built a better place to live than people like themselves.
Look at a listing of nations by highest percentage of Muslims. You have places like Afghanistan, 99.8% Muslim, where former 13 year old child "brides" are raped, beaten and have their ears and noses cut off by their "husbands". Iran (99.7%), Iraq (98.9%), Yemen (99%), "modern" Turkey (98.6%). Would any sane person voluntarily leave the U.S. or Finland or the Netherlands and move to one of those countries? I would rather be in prison in America than live in a place like Afghanistan or Iran. I don't want to move there and since I am a Christian and not afraid to say it, they don't want me there and would probably express their displeasure by cutting my head off.
The next leap.
What happens in places like the United States, Norway, France, etc. when the people who have the culture and characteristics of places they wanted to flee from start to become more and more culturally dominate in the places they fled to? We already see this in Scandinavia where absorbing thousands of "refugees" has made places that were once safe completely off-limits for Whites, especially women. The result is the place you moved to doesn't make life better for you in the long run, instead your presence and refusal to assimilate makes the place you fled to as bad as the place you fled from. That is not going to happen soon in the majority of the U.S. because of the sheer mass of people and the general difficulty of getting here from Africa and the Middle East (unlike Mexico) but it is already happening in Europe in smaller nations and we see it happening here in places like California and Texas as they fill up with Mexicans and the White birthrate continues to drop like a stone.
It is a crude and probably racist analogy but throwing a bar of soap into a mud puddle doesn't make the mud puddle cleaner, it just makes the bar of soap dirty. The Bible teaches that a little bit of leaven leavens the entire loaf (1 Corinthians 5:6) and the more you forcibly cram people who are from backwards nations into advanced nations, the greater the impact. Our refugees and illegal immigrants are not enhancing our culture, they are degrading it and turning parts of America into mirror images of the very places they are fleeing from. That doesn't help them nor is it compassionate and it is harmful and destructive to the very aspects of America and Europe that make refugees risk death to flee there in the first place.
This sort of logical progression in thought escapes the emotion-driven, "muh feelz" denizens of the American Left. They never think beyond the next five minutes and never seem able to think more than one step into a proposed solution. As a result we get people who think that a 3 month temporary ban on a very select, targeted set of nations with obvious security issues is somehow a human rights disaster. Trying to explain the thought process above to liberals is usually a waste of time because they lack the critical thinking skills to even consider it. Thus it is the responsibility and duty for those of us who care about this country and our traditional heritage to pass those critical thinking skills on to our children (which assumes we will have children in the first place).
If you want to actually help refugees and people who are disadvantaged in other countries, you should first consider the needs of people in this country and also that this country is $20 trillion in debt, a debt that will cripple the economy of our children. Second, if you are so inclined you really ought to think of ways to help them where they are. Foremost among this would be to stop meddling in foreign affairs which increases the instability of those countries and creates a sense of "you break it, you buy it" responsibility to "fix" the nations we broke. Letting people with a shared identity and a shared culture control their own destiny rather than piggy-backing on that of another people is far more compassionate. Self-determination is part of what made America great and we shouldn't seek to take that away from people from other countries to "rescue" them. Instead let them forge their own destiny. If all cultures are equally valuable and all people are essentially equal in ability, and that is what we are told over and over, then they should be able to do just fine on their own without Western imperialism hindering their growth. Of course logic and history undercuts that theory but that doesn't obligate the U.S. and Europe to become precisely the sort of places these people are fleeing from in the first place.
You can't improve the lives of people by permitting them to replicate their social malformations in new and exciting places. We need to be firm in defending what makes our nations and our culture the envy of the world and encourage other nations to forge their own path forward instead of opening our borders to their citizens. We have an obligation, I might even say a sacred obligation, to preserve our culture for our children and that is more important than suicidal gestures that clearly have never been thought out.
The latest case in point, skipping for the nonce the nomination last night of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court which is causing all sorts of overwrought reactions, is the very reasonable and probably far too lenient and temporary restriction on travel to the U.S. from states that are known hotbeds of anti-Western terrorism and the general chaos that accompanies Islam, especially where it is found without the slightly civilizing influence of lots of oil money. The wailing and crying from people like life-long Jewish politician Chuck Schumer, who seems oblivious to the fact that the people he wants to import into America in massive numbers also hate his guts for being a Jew and many would gladly toss him off of a building, is silly and wildly ignorant. I have found very, very few people on social media, even from normally thoughtful if misguided people, that have taken the time to think through these questions at even the most basic level. Let me throw a little something out there....
In general the refugees and illegal immigrant laborers of this world come from either Muslim countries or countries that are predominantly black or Hispanic. You probably have noticed that at the present no one is talking about building a wall to keep Canadians from crossing our borders, although given the idiot who is Prime Minister currently that might be a topic for the future. The simple fact that refugees and illegal aliens come almost exclusively from nations that share one or both of those attributes is without question. That brings us to the next point. There must be something about those nations that generates so many refugees and illegal aliens. This is where the liberal mind breaks down. They simply cannot take that next step. "We need to help the black and brown refugees" is where they stop without ever wondering why all of the refugees are black and brown in the first place.
The second point is that almost all of these refugees who are able to do so are heading for countries that also share some common characteristics. They tend to head for countries that are, or at least used to be, predominantly White and at least nominally Christian. Countries like the U.S., Germany, England, Sweden, etc. share a common heritage and offer the refugee and illegal alien a wealth of advantages over other nations that demographically and culturally are similar to what they are trying to flee from.
In other words, people from black and brown and/or Muslim dominated nations are desperately trying to leave the company of other people who look and/or believe like they do and go to countries where people don't look and don't believe as they do. The culture is different, the religion is different, even the climate is different and yet you still have Somalians moving to tropical paradises like Columbus, Ohio and Minneapolis.
What is up with that? Either one of two possibilities must be in play here. Either they are heading for these countries under false pretenses in order to wage jihad, which many of them clearly are, or there are fleeing their own nations and the company of their own people because being in a nation that is White and nominally Christian beats being in a country that is black or brown and/or Muslim.
Here comes the next leap. If there are valid reasons for wanting to go from one culture and move at great risk to another culture, it means that the receiving culture is superior in some ways, enough so that leaving your homeland is worth it. Saying something like that is absolutely forbidden in our "enlightened" society but that doesn't make it less true. They aren't trying to come to America because they think their lives will be worse here but because they think their lives will be better and that is because the make-up and culture of America and Europe is better than the same in Africa, the Middle-East, Mexico, Cuba, etc. People don't flee Somalia to go to Yemen. They don't leave Mexico to go to Columbia. They leave nations that are full of people like themselves to go to nations full of people not like themselves because the people not like themselves have built a better place to live than people like themselves.
Look at a listing of nations by highest percentage of Muslims. You have places like Afghanistan, 99.8% Muslim, where former 13 year old child "brides" are raped, beaten and have their ears and noses cut off by their "husbands". Iran (99.7%), Iraq (98.9%), Yemen (99%), "modern" Turkey (98.6%). Would any sane person voluntarily leave the U.S. or Finland or the Netherlands and move to one of those countries? I would rather be in prison in America than live in a place like Afghanistan or Iran. I don't want to move there and since I am a Christian and not afraid to say it, they don't want me there and would probably express their displeasure by cutting my head off.
The next leap.
What happens in places like the United States, Norway, France, etc. when the people who have the culture and characteristics of places they wanted to flee from start to become more and more culturally dominate in the places they fled to? We already see this in Scandinavia where absorbing thousands of "refugees" has made places that were once safe completely off-limits for Whites, especially women. The result is the place you moved to doesn't make life better for you in the long run, instead your presence and refusal to assimilate makes the place you fled to as bad as the place you fled from. That is not going to happen soon in the majority of the U.S. because of the sheer mass of people and the general difficulty of getting here from Africa and the Middle East (unlike Mexico) but it is already happening in Europe in smaller nations and we see it happening here in places like California and Texas as they fill up with Mexicans and the White birthrate continues to drop like a stone.
It is a crude and probably racist analogy but throwing a bar of soap into a mud puddle doesn't make the mud puddle cleaner, it just makes the bar of soap dirty. The Bible teaches that a little bit of leaven leavens the entire loaf (1 Corinthians 5:6) and the more you forcibly cram people who are from backwards nations into advanced nations, the greater the impact. Our refugees and illegal immigrants are not enhancing our culture, they are degrading it and turning parts of America into mirror images of the very places they are fleeing from. That doesn't help them nor is it compassionate and it is harmful and destructive to the very aspects of America and Europe that make refugees risk death to flee there in the first place.
This sort of logical progression in thought escapes the emotion-driven, "muh feelz" denizens of the American Left. They never think beyond the next five minutes and never seem able to think more than one step into a proposed solution. As a result we get people who think that a 3 month temporary ban on a very select, targeted set of nations with obvious security issues is somehow a human rights disaster. Trying to explain the thought process above to liberals is usually a waste of time because they lack the critical thinking skills to even consider it. Thus it is the responsibility and duty for those of us who care about this country and our traditional heritage to pass those critical thinking skills on to our children (which assumes we will have children in the first place).
If you want to actually help refugees and people who are disadvantaged in other countries, you should first consider the needs of people in this country and also that this country is $20 trillion in debt, a debt that will cripple the economy of our children. Second, if you are so inclined you really ought to think of ways to help them where they are. Foremost among this would be to stop meddling in foreign affairs which increases the instability of those countries and creates a sense of "you break it, you buy it" responsibility to "fix" the nations we broke. Letting people with a shared identity and a shared culture control their own destiny rather than piggy-backing on that of another people is far more compassionate. Self-determination is part of what made America great and we shouldn't seek to take that away from people from other countries to "rescue" them. Instead let them forge their own destiny. If all cultures are equally valuable and all people are essentially equal in ability, and that is what we are told over and over, then they should be able to do just fine on their own without Western imperialism hindering their growth. Of course logic and history undercuts that theory but that doesn't obligate the U.S. and Europe to become precisely the sort of places these people are fleeing from in the first place.
You can't improve the lives of people by permitting them to replicate their social malformations in new and exciting places. We need to be firm in defending what makes our nations and our culture the envy of the world and encourage other nations to forge their own path forward instead of opening our borders to their citizens. We have an obligation, I might even say a sacred obligation, to preserve our culture for our children and that is more important than suicidal gestures that clearly have never been thought out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)