tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-69420611285583477822023-11-16T02:45:42.725-05:00Alt-Right RisingA new venture looking at the world of nationalism, race realism, white identity and white culture preservation.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.comBlogger36125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-1712442254753738082017-06-29T19:37:00.003-04:002017-06-29T19:37:37.771-04:00Moving!For reasons I will explain there I am moving my blogging activity to a new address:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><a href="http://securingourposterity.blogspot.com/"><span style="font-size: large;">Ourselves And Our Posterity</span></a></b></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://media.giphy.com/media/l2Sq8hfsfy0RPQgs8/giphy.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="270" data-original-width="480" height="180" src="https://media.giphy.com/media/l2Sq8hfsfy0RPQgs8/giphy.gif" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
I hope to see you there!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-11853981294540442942017-06-25T10:00:00.001-04:002017-06-25T10:00:43.864-04:00The Alt-Right And ChristianityChristianity and the Alt-Right have a troubled relationship. On the one hand, issues of race realism and nationalism are clearly seen as a threat by people like Russell Moore as shown by the completely random and unnecessary condemnation of the Alt-Right at the recent annual gathering of the Southern Baptist Convention. Evangelical Christianity and conservative branches of Roman Catholicism and Orthodoxy (for clarity, I don't consider Catholicism or Orthodoxy to be genuine expression of Christianity, to a lesser extent than outright heretical movements like Mormonism) are also the <b>single greatest source</b> of potential recruits as they are dominated by White men who are also politically conservative and less likely than the average Joe to be completely cucked. On the other hand, there are plenty of loud voices in the Alt-Right who seem hell bent on denigrating the Christian faith, preferring a thoroughly secular movement, or at least one that elevates ancient and dead pagan religions or demands, ironically like the Left, that Christians keep their mouths shut about their faith if they want to get into the alt-right treehouse.<br />
<br />
This is self-defeating and destructive.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizB6uYUVBS2Vx8_7Ma1BDTps_NaD7ADn2lREmZNEROzzZLYRBFp07zpy4MmEgwLvAM_gmFt9UEUkeF-VJlff3mhBjc53VPE62HDXoRsAhAflbVzs20vtAjuS-LgJEMmy38GP_LauIQf0uq/s1600/aryan+family.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="700" data-original-width="534" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizB6uYUVBS2Vx8_7Ma1BDTps_NaD7ADn2lREmZNEROzzZLYRBFp07zpy4MmEgwLvAM_gmFt9UEUkeF-VJlff3mhBjc53VPE62HDXoRsAhAflbVzs20vtAjuS-LgJEMmy38GP_LauIQf0uq/s320/aryan+family.jpg" width="244" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">If this imagery isn't central to your vision for<br />a White future, your vision is empty and hopeless.</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
What does the Alt-Right in particular and any hope of rescuing and preserving White European culture more generally need? It needs a lot of White men with wives and children to pass on our values to the next generation and it needs numbers. What does it seem to have and attract a lot of? Unmarried and/or childless bitter young men who don't seem able to distinguish between male headship in the home and church versus garden variety frustration fueled misogyny. There are actually a lot of guys in the alt-right who produce great material that have families but some of the loudest voices are hardly poster-boys for family values and the commenters on those sites are often equally vicious and ignorant when it comes to faith.<br />
<br />
How do we bridge the gap between the more garden variety Breitbart conservatives and the Alt-Right? I am not really interested in how to appeal to the Wall Street Journal Republican or the National Review Republican. The WSJ crowd is consumed with tax cuts and tax breaks that may be good policy but are entirely targeted toward a very small, very wealthy group. The NRO crowd is mostly concerned with starting new wars to appease their Jewish neo-con masters. I am concerned with making a place for people who are slowly being driven out of their denominations and political parties and right now the alt-right is kind of a hostile place for them. The future growth of the alt-right and I believe the only hope for our people is not found in bored rich kids who amuse themselves by being an edgy racist and advocate for socialist economic policies or in anonymous internet trolls who have a chip on their shoulders about religion. It is in garden variety, salt of the earth working class and middle class Whites and the reality is that these Whites go to church in huge numbers and that is to their credit. Yammering about Odin worship or accusing all Christians of being complicit in the Catholic priest sex abuse cover-up is going to drive those people away and since they have nowhere else to go it is most likely going to black pill these people and cause them to disengage entirely. Having a majority of Whites blackpilled serves just as well as having them totally cucked.<br />
<br />
There are some good voices in the alt-right that balance being a faithful Christian with being a race realist but they are not nearly as popular as others.<br />
<br />
For the vision of the alt-right of true self-determination for White Europeans to come to fruition it needs to be a popular movement. Being a fringe movement of internet trolls, memes and based tweets is nice if you want to "be right" while your country burns down around you and your people are exterminated. If you want to see a <u>real</u> future for European people and culture, you need to hit a critical mass of people and the people you need the most are White Christian families. It might not matter to the highly energized but largely impotent people who prowl blogs all day offering what they think is cutting commentary but a guy who works hard building houses for a living to provide for his family and goes to church faithfully on Sunday is not impressed by your juvenile humor nor is he swayed by your clumsy anti-Christianity rhetoric. He also works for a living and could probably snap most pasty basement dwelling internet trolls in half with his bare hands. The people who will make or break this movement are Baptists and Presbyterians as well as Catholics and Russian Orthodox and Mormons and the alt-right drives them away to its peril.<br />
<br />
If the alt-right is going to expand beyond a liberal bogeyman and a small cadre of celebrity racists and their sycophantic followers, it is going to need a lot more people and a whole bunch of those people are in church today. Facts are inconvenient things but that doesn't make them less true. The leaders of the alt-right better figure this out pretty quickly or the alt-right will be just another scalp in the belt of the SPLC and find itself on the ash heap of history next to the skinheads and eventually the White race itself.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-3133273958226630182017-06-22T18:00:00.000-04:002017-06-22T18:00:02.756-04:00Maybe The Problem Isn't MoneyA few weeks ago a news report came out that was sure to provoke all the wrong responses. The title says most of what you need to know:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><a href="http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/report-75-black-california-boys-fail-meet-reading-writing-standards/">Report: 75% Of Black California Boys Fail To Meet Reading And Writing Standards</a></b></div>
<br />
Anyone who is shocked by these findings, raise your hand.<br />
<br />
Anyone?<br />
<br />
Anyone at all?<br />
<br />
I didn't think so. The report goes on to tell us that not only are they not up to snuff, they are <u>way below</u> snuff.<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>The state DOE administered the tests in the fall of 2016,
but released the data at the end of May, after it was analyzed by CALmatters, a
non-profit journalism venture dedicated to exploring state policies and
politics. <u>Over 50 percent of these boys scored in the lowest category on the
test’s English section, trailing far behind their female classmates.</u> The
disparity reflects a widening gender gap in literacy scores across ethnic
groups.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><st1:state w:st="on">California</st1:state>
published separate figures on the performance of various ethnic and economic
groups, but did not offer a more detailed breakdown of how boys and girls
perform within those groups, with state officials claiming that sorting the
data is costly and time consuming. This recent data provides rare insight into
how gender interacts with race and class in mastering basic literacy skills.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>Female students hold a sizable lead over their male
classmates in language arts. <u>The gap spans all grade levels, and a higher
family income does not appear to have an effect.</u> The gap is also not unique to <st1:state w:st="on">California</st1:state>, given that
girls out-read boys in almost every country and at every age.</b></blockquote>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
So, from that we discover that half of the boys scored in the very lowest possible category, which I have to assume is "barely literate in any sense". But something else was interesting and I also underlined that in the third paragraph. Here is is again: "<b>The gap spans all grade levels, and a higher family income does not appear to have an effect.</b>".</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
That doesn't match what we are always told, that black underachievement is the result of poverty. It doesn't matter the age or the family financial situation. Black boys simply do not read and write with any level of proficiency that you would expect given how much we spend a year on public schooling.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The usual excuses are made by the usual suspects:</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>“Part of this may be structural, in having texts that aren’t relevant to the experiences and legacy of African-American boys,” said Chris Chatmon, executive director of the African-American Male Achievement program at the Oakland Unified School District. “When a lot of the curriculum you have access to isn’t familiar, or doesn’t acknowledge your past or your present, you have a tendency not to be engaged with it or want to read it.”
</b></blockquote>
</div>
The African-American Male Achievement Program. What an ironic name since black male students are not achieving much of anything. It is also a load of crap. I am not a Hobbit living in Middle-Earth and I have never met a wizard or a Nazgul but that doesn't mean I can't appreciate and learn from the Lord of the Rings, I have never been to England or anywhere else in Europe but I still can learn from the classical authors of Western civilization. The other major problem is that if you restrict the course material to texts that are familiar to black boys or are "relevant" to their experiences, you don't have much to work with. There aren't exactly a plethora of black writers who are on par with Charles Dickens, C.S. Lewis or Shakespeare. Perhaps these black boys would benefit from reading works that challenge and expand their horizons instead of insisting that they can only learn from fellow African-Americans?<br />
<br />
Or just maybe the problem is much more fundamental. Blacks just are not as intelligent and academically inclined as White and Asian students. You don't see a lot of Korean-American kids who can dunk a basketball or dominate the 100 meter dash but no one seems to care about that. Pretending that the problems of underachievement can all be solved by moving the bar or pushing more black focused curriculum or the old standby, throwing money at the problem (how much do you supposed Chris Chatmon mentioned above makes?) isn't going to change anything. Look at the difference in college completion rates from <a href="https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/04/26/college-completion-rates-vary-race-and-ethnicity-report-finds">Inside Higher Education</a>:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4XAtSilpaNpFIHzJK_NeLC_xi7DF65pYkTD7RdWH7R-7bGr3VVkuK5lchVA2-p3m4PS-W9Ej2-TJPOMhNcNr0sOoe_la_whugOhgX5C_xYTHRLSzuWPnh1ZGJ3rJh1RT7nDDcDdHgTbHU/s1600/racial+graduation+rates.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="677" data-original-width="994" height="272" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4XAtSilpaNpFIHzJK_NeLC_xi7DF65pYkTD7RdWH7R-7bGr3VVkuK5lchVA2-p3m4PS-W9Ej2-TJPOMhNcNr0sOoe_la_whugOhgX5C_xYTHRLSzuWPnh1ZGJ3rJh1RT7nDDcDdHgTbHU/s400/racial+graduation+rates.png" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Of blacks who start college, six years later <b>only 38%</b> have a degree. That compares poorly to Hispanics at 46% and even worse compared to Whites (62%) and Asians (63%). Keep in mind that colleges and universities trip over themselves to cater to blacks and they <b>still</b> are failing/dropping out at a high rate. In spite of that, there is still a huge push to get as many blacks into college as possible.<br />
<br />
At every level and despite vast sums of money being spent, blacks and to a lesser extend Hispanics, lag behind Whites and Asians. Everyone knows it but we are always told that the problem is anything but the source material, the students themselves. It is poverty, it is Eurocentric curriculum, cultural bias, whatever. We keep making excuses, blacks keep on failing and the solution is to keep doing what we were doing, only with more gusto and money!<br />
<br />
We should be steering blacks toward vocational training so they can get jobs that they can actually do instead of promising jobs that they can't get the education for. A young black man is going to be far better off if he gets vocational training and starts a career at 20 as a carpenter instead of going to college, failing out and finding himself without an education and without skills at 20.<br />
<br />
Of course saying that is racist. So is suggesting that importing even more people who actually have even lower IQs and then wondering what to do with them might be bad policy. In fact anything other than mindlessly repeating the mantra "It's not their fault" is racist.<br />
<br />
Maybe what is really "racist" is to use blacks as pawns in your political power plays regardless of whether it helps them or not?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-8322393236349707892017-06-21T11:20:00.001-04:002017-06-21T11:20:50.118-04:00Devouring OurselvesAs someone fairly new (less than a year) to being sold on the red-pill and accepting much of standard alt-right orthodoxy, I have noticed a very familiar pattern. That pattern is seen in lots of high-commitment groups, from sports to theology to politics. It manifests itself in endless sniff testing and ideological purity purges. Oh, you are a New York Yankees fan? What is your opinion of Billy Martin? Hah, I knew it! You are a poser, a fake fan! Begone!<br />
<br />
The base position of people like this, whatever the context, is that they would rather win the argument than win the war. Being "pure" in your position is better than being triumphant. That is fine when the argument is over sports, if you want to sit in your man-cave with all of your overpriced sports memorabilia and gloat about being the world's biggest <insert team name> fan, go for it. It is juvenile but generally harmless.<br />
<br />
If you are talking about the continued existence or very probably extinction of a race and culture, then being the most rightest guy around doesn't count for much. When your race is gone and your culture is relegated to a footnote, those who replaced you won't applaud your principled stance. Instead they will more likely laugh at you out loud while silently thanking you for making their task easier.<br />
<br />
That is kind of the situation the alt-right has found itself in. Prior to 2016, who had heard of the "alt-right"? White nationalism was hidden under the cultural lore of the Klan, skinheads and "neo-Nazis". It was a fringe of a fringe of a fringe. But in 2016, ironically due in no small part to the real head of the Clinton crime family, i.e. Hillary, mentioning the alt-right in a speech and getting heckled with "Pepe!" shouts during speeches, the alt-right burst onto the mainstream and was given outsized credit for electing Donald Trump.<br />
<br />
Then the wheels started coming off.<br />
<br />
Mere weeks after the election, the National Policy Institute held it's conference and because of the outcome of the election is got a lot of press. It especially got a lot of press because of this:<br />
<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/1o6-bi3jlxk?rel=0" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
This was the first sign of things to come. The media jumped all over it. Almost no one knows the content of the talks given, just that at one point Spencer somewhat jokingly said "Hail Trump!" and a few people in the audience tossed up a "Nazi salute". You can quibble over the true meaning of it but in America a raised hand in that manner means only one thing "Sieg Heil". Richard might as well have been wearing a hat with a Gestapo <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totenkopf">totenkopf</a> on it. It was the first taste of what genuine media attention would look like going forward.<br />
<br />
Over the next 7 months a pattern has been repeated. Some segments of the alt-right seem determined to turn the alt-right into a brand and market the crap out of it. Like a corporate marketing department they jealously guard their brand. If you don't know what I mean, try modifying a famous corporate logo a little and see what happens.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgDWltmFnidz1SxjmzSDICZ2Re7CJYZQvWIul5Z58Y2rbFV0MZy1ENF6OJ7hqsYHyKvzHEUJb77S3YqXRF4G-enMmtQCIgxTB1WM__0S-XmJSers8KANLPgSbhf5rb7dD8Lkxb_QmUvdV36/s1600/mcdowells.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="718" data-original-width="1277" height="179" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgDWltmFnidz1SxjmzSDICZ2Re7CJYZQvWIul5Z58Y2rbFV0MZy1ENF6OJ7hqsYHyKvzHEUJb77S3YqXRF4G-enMmtQCIgxTB1WM__0S-XmJSers8KANLPgSbhf5rb7dD8Lkxb_QmUvdV36/s320/mcdowells.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Don't misunderstand. There are a lot of good things going on. From the attacks by "antifa" on Spencer and others to the mobs on campus attacking Milo (who is not alt-right at all) and Charles Murray (also not alt-right at all) to the recent ridiculous anti-alt-right resolution at the Southern Baptist Convention, the alt-right and White nationalism in general is drawing a lot of attention and in spite of the best efforts of the media and "mainstream" conservatives alike to discredit the ideas, I believe the alt-right has a lot of momentum. Every time someone punches Richard Spencer and his name gets googled, more people get exposed and that is how the ideas spread. A lot of White people already secretly believe much of what White nationalism teaches and instinctively understand the peril our race and culture is in and finding out that a lot of other people feel the same way without wearing silly white hoods or having shaved heads is encouraging. I think the number of people exposed to and buying into our ideas is lightyears ahead of where it was this time last year.<br />
<br />
It is also a curse because the last seven months have also seen a ton of ideological purges and pogroms. To me, people who are popular and part of the way toward where we are serve as a useful stepping stone. To others they are responded to like Nike suing a shoe manufacturer for making a knock-off Air Jordan and calling it the Air Johnson. There are so many smart, funny and persuasive people who are not "alt-right" proper. I am sure I am not sufficiently ideologically pure in some eyes to even embrace the label alt-right. But those people with blogs, twitter accounts and especially Youtube channels are what I would consider sympathetic co-belligerents. We don't share 100% of the same goals but we do share a lot of them and we also have a very similar enemies list. For example, Milo is a degenerate sodomite. There isn't a nicer way of putting it. I don't want him in my home or around my kids. But like a court jester he gets people laughing and perhaps thinking. He is not one of us in any way but he helps move the Overton window toward us and that struggle is constant. If it ain't moving your way, it is moving against you. We have been losing that fight for a long time as evidenced by the fact that suddenly "transgender rights" are <u>the most important</u> issue of our day and pedophilia is right on the cusp of acceptable discourse. If people like Milo and others say publicly what we already know on topics like race, "immigration", the culture destroying danger of Islam, etc., it shifts the range of discourse and people start talking about the same things we are talking about.<br />
<br />
We are right in the middle of another public squabble. I won't go into the issues or the combatants because it isn't important and I am not sure I understand it all. All I know is that it distracts from the real issues, gives aid and comfort to our enemies and wastes energy on petty squabbles and "more White nationalist than thou" crap. I am concerned that this is really about pride, influence and money and that sort of squabble has the potential to derail the entire movement for the sake of a few more hits on one website rather than another.<br />
<br />
Hold firm to your convictions, I would never say otherwise. But please keep our elective eyes on the prize and more importantly the peril. This is a critical time for the movement and it could make or break us. Do we want to end up as a tiny fringe of ideological purity with a couple of megalomaniacs and their fanboys? Or do we want to be the vanguard of a reawakening of our people that will save our future for our posterity? The answer is everything and a lot of people need to figure that out.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-36659949840951880152017-06-19T14:30:00.000-04:002017-06-19T14:30:06.846-04:00You Had Best Uncuck YourselfIn my normie life I frequent a lot of "conservative" haunts on the internet, including some that less astute people would consider "far right". Most of my social media acquaintances are very conservative. What I have noticed is that a ton of them are "right on the edge". They are on the cusp of being awakened, they see the red pill and are reaching for it but something is holding them back. They just can't take the leap.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOO5RcKzqnYMmZlIVeKVCBVeXkmg4-lmEj-frQQAmyEnFxBVKlDgUjtINc_7gxTE0bK_kzTYwCbLwTps9Uq1ehp2h8bGdAosfU1Rit3z2ol-4pLcff8kbpkt-hAatxRzEn9Uq0dagu3ElR/s1600/chew+bubblegum.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="360" data-original-width="480" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOO5RcKzqnYMmZlIVeKVCBVeXkmg4-lmEj-frQQAmyEnFxBVKlDgUjtINc_7gxTE0bK_kzTYwCbLwTps9Uq1ehp2h8bGdAosfU1Rit3z2ol-4pLcff8kbpkt-hAatxRzEn9Uq0dagu3ElR/s320/chew+bubblegum.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
This is not an accident.<br />
<br />
I am sure that everyone who is recently red-pilled has some experiences with what I am talking about. There are times when I get ready to post something here or on Twitter or Gab, not even a really outrageous thing, and I still get that twinge. "You can't say that!" is what goes through my mind. My wife is the same way. I am smack dab in what you would call middle-aged and it happens to me. I grew up in a far less PC time where you could still jokingly use ethnic insults with friends and people were not squeamish about warning you to stay away from dangerous neighborhoods. Everyone understood that homosexuality was a weird perversion, that men who dressed like women were mentally ill, that getting knocked up out of wedlock was a bad thing for the mother and child and that miscegenation was frowned upon. Despite that we have all been lured into an abusive relationship with the entertainment world and thanks in large part to that we have been inundated with political correctness, which is a nice way of saying that we (by "we" I mean White, heterosexual, gainfully employed and especially Christian Americans) have been taught a virulent strain of self-loathing. We have been taught that a lot of topics are completely off-limits and out-of-bounds: why doesn't anyone talk about why minorities commit more crimes, why doesn't anyone point out that replacing European heritage Americans with Muslims, Mexicans and Africans is going to irreparably change our nation, why don't we talk about the future when elderly Whites who worked their whole lives to build this country are going to be at the mercy of non-Whites who will feel no obligation to fund Social Security and Medicare? Alongside being muzzled, we are also endlessly told that White people didn't build this country (Or as Comrade Obama would say to every hard-working entrepreneur in this country "You didn't build that", as if he has ever built anything worthwhile in his life) and in fact that White people and Western culture are terrible, although no one seems to wonder if White majority Western nations are so bad, why do non-Whites so desperately want to come here instead of the other way around?<br />
<br />
For people that are, let's say 10-15 years younger than me that have been out of school for a while, this is far more acute. In school we had very little PC nonsense or at least it was less obvious. World War II was about battles, not Japanese internment camps. Today young adults have been fed a literal lifetime of multicultural indoctrination coupled with an unsubtle loathing of their own Whiteness. Gone are the days of Ward on <i>Leave it to Beaver</i> and shows like <i>Father Knows Best</i> where White fathers went to work and came home to their intact families with normal kids and loving wives and were wise, strict but compassionate. Young adults now grew up with Al Bundy, Homer Simpson and a rogue's gallery of White fathers who were dumb, unhip, bumbling, lazy and married to angry, disdainful harpies. There is no better example of this than the 1999 critically acclaimed film <i>American Beauty</i> where the lead character is a White guy with a family that is dysfunctional as can be, a guy who is cheated on by his wife and who lusts after his daughter's teen-aged friend. The only "normal family" in the movie is a benevolent and warm and perfectly delightful homosexual couple. Little wonder adults of that age are messed up and self-loathing.<br />
<br />
There is more hope for the up and coming generation of adults. Having been lectured, hectored, scolded and marketed to their entire lives, they are highly cynical and skeptical. It is kind of ironic that the generation that has been exposed to the most open and constant barrage of political correctness and White self-loathing is also less likely to buy it. Unfortunately the same is not true of their opinions when it comes to human sexuality but that is a topic for another day.<br />
<br />
The question for me is how to reach that middle generation and adults of my own generation who are so close to breaking free but can't quite do it. Pepe and other dank memes are great for the younger kids but aren't going to get it done for older adults. This is where we need to be very careful. Careful about the message and careful about the messengers. There is an important part to play in this movement for people "in-between", Youtube content creators who are politically incorrect but not quite completely racially awoke. Political and cultural writers on the fringe of conservative respectability. These people serve as a bridge from mainstream "conservatism" which is run by effeminate guys like George Will and Jewish neocons, people who are happy as long as they can keep making a ton of money with their pious musings safe on their perches, to the people on our side who use facts, reason and logic to dismantle the narrative of the globalist, statist, anti-White Left. Screaming "cuck!" at everyone who is not on board 100% with the JQ is counter-productive, and I fear it is a sign that for some "leaders" in the alt-right, the alt-right itself is a brand to be jealously guarded for their own benefit.<br />
<br />
I think it is too late to save this country as it was but I also think there is a chance for a Great Awakening that will, if channeled properly, allow us to salvage what we can of America for Americans and our posterity. Now is the time to keep up the pressure, to never let up on the counter-multicultural narrative. Those who oppose our message will never stop. They are fanatics for their cause and their hatred for Whites is unquenchable. We must be equally resolute in our message. We have history, we have facts, we have logic, we have reason, all on our side but the Left and corporatist establishment Right have control of the engines of popular culture and "education". They have been waging a multi-front war and so must we in our counter-offensive.<br />
<br />
If White Americans don't uncuck ourselves and soon, there will be nothing left and we will be forced into hiding in our homes while this country burns down around us or find ourselves fleeing to Eastern Europe. I am not ready to pack my bags for Poland or Hungary just yet, not while there is still a chance to reclaim the European heritage that made America great in the first place.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-46122429847325961362017-06-19T08:33:00.000-04:002017-06-19T08:36:31.532-04:00The Gander Meets The Goose In LondonReports from overnight claim that a man drove a van into a crowd of people in London, killing one and injuring 10 others from initial reports. No big deal, right? This happens all the time, we #prayforlondon and offer empty platitudes on social media and then go on like nothing happened.<br />
<br />
Au contraire!<br />
<br />
This time the attacker was apparently a White guy, in other words an actual Englishman, and the victims were Muslims leaving midnight prayers. That of course changes everything! The outrage meter is going off the charts!<br />
<br />
Normally when someone with a Muslim name blows himself and others up while yelling "Allahu akbar!" or runs people over and then stabs them while shouting "This is for Allah!", we have absolutely no idea what motivated him. None. It is a mystery. Perhaps it was climate change or a lack of a jobs program or insufficient welfare payments. No matter what, we mustn't jump to conclusions and anyone who does is either scolded publicly, even if they are the President of the United States, or they are in trouble with the law (Tommy Robinson). Less than twelve hours after the attack at Finsbury Park? Oh we know what the motivation was and it was definitely terrorism. According to the police statement:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>“No matter what the motivation proves to be, and we are keeping an open mind, this is being treated as a terrorist attack and the Counter Terrorism Command is investigating.”
</b></blockquote>
No matter what! I guess as a rebellious colonial subject I don't understand the Queen's English all that well because when you say you are keeping an open mind but have already come to a conclusion, "no matter what", that sounds contradictory.<br />
<br />
Of course the outrage from Muslims, who suddenly are getting a taste of the cultural enrichment they spread all over the West, is off the charts. The mayor of London, Muslim Sadiq Khan, said:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>London Mayor Sadiq Khan, the first Muslim to serve in that position, said extra police would be deployed. He called the incident a "horrific terrorist attack."
</b></blockquote>
That seems confusing...I tweeted my concern earlier today...<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<div dir="ltr" lang="en">
<a href="https://twitter.com/SadiqKhan">@SadiqKhan</a> Whites get run over: "part and parcel". Muslims get run over: "horrific terrorist attack". <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FinsburyPark?src=hash">#FinsburyPark</a></div>
— El'geherg (@Elgeherg) <a href="https://twitter.com/Elgeherg/status/876738486090555392">June 19, 2017</a></blockquote>
<br />
Didn't Mayor Khan say that terrorism was just part and parcel of living in a large city? I guess I don't understand the subtle nuances of big city politics.<br />
<br />
When a Muslim kills non-Muslims in the name of Allah, we have to be careful and tolerant. We should hashtag the crap out of the incident and bring stuffed animals, candles and flowers to where people were butchered in the latest attack on the west, a series of attacks by Islam on the West for something like 1500 years. The police should be deployed to keep anyone from making an intemperate statement. Above all we should go about our lives as usual, otherwise the terrorists win! When an apparent non-Muslim attacks Muslims? Everything is on the table.<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
From Breitbart:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) said in a statement: “We
should make clear that if this attack is confirmed as a deliberate terrorist
attack then this should be classed as an act of terrorism.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>“The British Muslim community requires all decent people to
stand with us against this evil violence.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>“Rampant Islamaphobia [sic] has been on the rise for a
number of years and those on the far right have perpetuated hatred against
Muslims. They should be called out for their hatred.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>“The days ahead will be difficult, but with unity and
tolerance we will prevail. We will not allow these far right extremists to
divide our diverse communities.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>“Enough is enough, my condolences and prayers for all the
victims and their families. They are in my prayers.”</b></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Oh, the British Muslim community <b><u>requires</u></b> all "decent people" to stand with them. <b>REQUIRES</b>. It is
strange that the Muslim Council of Britain blames the "far right" for
this attack but never admits Islam is behind every other terrorist attack. This
requirement makes clear, if you don't do everything we demand, which no doubt
will include cracking down on non-Muslim free speech, you are not a decent
person. How would I sleep at night if the Muslim Council of Britain didn't deem me to be a decent person? More response from Muslims...</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
From <b><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/19/london-van-attack-one-dead-as-police-investigate-incident-as-terrorism.html">Fox News</a></b>:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>A leader of the Muslim Council of Britain called for extra
security at mosques in light of the apparent attack. The group's general
secretary, Harun Khan, described the incident as a hate crime against Muslims.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>"During the night, ordinary British citizens were set
upon while they were going about their lives, completing their night
worship," he said. "It appears from eyewitness accounts that the
perpetrator was motivated by Islamophobia."</b></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I wonder who will pay for the extra security? Oh that's
right, the British people will. It isn't like they have spent untold millions
of pounds to respond to and prevent Islamic terror attacks, now they have to
pay for "extra security" to protect mosques. Perhaps an armed bodyguard for every Muslim in the U.K. would be reasonable?</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>The chairman of the Finsbury Park Mosque said the van crash
that hit worshippers was a "cowardly attack" and urged Muslims going
to mosques to be vigilant.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>Mohammed Kozbar said the Muslim community is "in
shock." He complained that the "mainstream media" was unwilling
to call the attack a terrorist incident for many hours.</b></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I guess restraint and caution, waiting for the facts to be gathered and the investigation
to play out and all of that is only applicable when it is non-Muslims lying
dead in the streets of <st1:country-region w:st="on">England</st1:country-region>. Don't rush to judgment...unless Muslims are the victims! You have to have a serious pair on you and/or a complete lack of self-awareness
to be spouting this stuff off. I have to hand it to them though, it takes a lot to constantly make the aggressor in a war between cultures seem like they are always they victims.</div>
<br />
I am not making light of this. OK, maybe a little but you can only push a people so far. When week after week, year after year, our news is filled with stories of the latest Muslim terror attack and people see pictures of little girls with their limbs torn from their body in the street, it is going to cause people to snap. It is a remarkable show of restraint that stuff like this doesn't happen more often. It isn't like Muslims are not victims of terror attacks but usually the perpetrators are other Muslims.<br />
<br />
What we can expect now is a knee-jerk crackdown from British authorities on "hate speech" and anyone on the "far right", regardless of what the motivations of the driver turn out to be (terrorism, no matter what), that will far exceed their response to multiple Muslim attacks over the course of this year. There is nothing a politician loves more than a good crisis (Rahm, are you listening?) that allows them to further weaken civil liberties.<br />
<br />
We can also expect to see more Islamic terror in the days to come. I would be a very surprised if there is not an attack this week, whether pre-planned or as a response to this incident. There are tens of thousands of jihadis in Britain already, plus who knows how many more the authorities are unaware of. Some were no doubt radicalized at the very same mosque that these Muslims were coming out of (which apparently has cleaned up it's act recently). This is exactly the sort of thing that can trigger them and the slaughter will continue.<br />
<br />
Traditional European values and Middle-Eastern values are simply incompatible and pretending otherwise is what causes these sort of conflicts. These people come with a completely alien worldview. Some may exhibit some signs of assimilation but more often they demand that the culture they have moved into change to accommodate them. The best thing for all concerned is for them to return to nations where their worldview is dominant and acceptable. Europe for Europeans, Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians. In return Western nations should stop meddling in the affairs of the Middle-East, Africa and Asia. Places with "diverse", "multicultural" populations see endless conflict. Places without much diversity, Japan, Switzerland, Iceland, Hungary, Poland, all seem to be relatively conflict free. People simply do better around their own people.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2iCHefiw8xyRmyshb6ALFXNdT5SB4MhkHPSAM0n_n3twJ6HO2ylbcHuuIMshCZOaEz4Onz9ae0eaEzwPego6L17g_GYJWUJzSkenD_RnQa0MkKe5t5VA714n70I3J0YrWI_N95GagHjGm/s1600/goose+and+gander.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="299" data-original-width="438" height="136" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2iCHefiw8xyRmyshb6ALFXNdT5SB4MhkHPSAM0n_n3twJ6HO2ylbcHuuIMshCZOaEz4Onz9ae0eaEzwPego6L17g_GYJWUJzSkenD_RnQa0MkKe5t5VA714n70I3J0YrWI_N95GagHjGm/s200/goose+and+gander.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
This attack was terrible. I don't want to see anyone run down while minding their own business on a street or a sidewalk. I don't want to see bombs dropped on Syria or Iran, I don't want to see Muslims killing other Muslims and I certainly don't want to see Muslims killing Whites or vice versa. I absolutely condemn acts like the one last night, just as I condemn the attacks in Manchester and on London Bridge and in Nice and in Orlando. But I am also not naive. Forcing incompatible worldviews together causes conflict and no matter how many teddy bears you leave at the site of a terrorist attack and no matter how much you talk about celebrating diversity, the clash of civilizations will continue to lead to bloodshed until one civilization or the other is vanquished. Instead of grandstanding and the muttering of empty platitudes from our "leaders", what we really need is a dose of reality. Until we get real about what needs to happen, like absolutely shutting the door to migrants and deporting those already in country while at the same time withdrawing Western military forces from the Middle East and Africa, this will continue to be commonplace, no matter how many hashtags we dream up.<br />
<script async="" charset="utf-8" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-12545051456100962962017-06-18T17:04:00.000-04:002017-06-18T17:04:32.403-04:00News Stories Our Parents Couldn't ImagineHappy Father's Day! I wonder how many more years it will be legal to say that before Father's Day gets outlawed because it doesn't include women who think they are men, especially butch lesbians, effeminate men with daddy issues, etc. Obviously a day that celebrates fathers is a tool of the patriarchy...<br />
<br />
While browsing through news this Sunday afternoon I stumbled onto a story that ought to be shocking. Not shocking because it is a story about a violent encounter but because of those it involved. The headline is innocuous enough:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/police-arrests-made-double-slaying-maryland-teens-020316519.html">Police: 3 arrested in double-slaying of Maryland teens</a></b></div>
<br />
When you dig into the story you will see what I mean....<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><st1:city w:st="on">GAITHERSBURG</st1:city>, <st1:state w:st="on">Md.</st1:state> (AP) — Three people have been charged with killing
two <st1:state w:st="on">Maryland</st1:state>
teens who were found dead the night before their high school graduation, and
police said they believe the slayings were revenge for a robbery that one of
the teens was rumored to have committed.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>T</b><b>he three are charged in the deaths of 17-year-old Shadi Adi
Najjar and 18-year-old Artem Ziberov, Montgomery County Police Chief J. Thomas
Manger said at a news conference late Saturday.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>The suspects were identified as 25-year-old Jose
Canales-Yanez, 19-year-old Roger Garcia and 24-year-old Edgar Garcia-Gaona.
Manger said each is being charged with two counts of first-degree murder and
conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. He said Garcia and Garcia-Gaona are
brothers.</b></blockquote>
<br />
No Smith's or Johnson's here. The murdered teens were Artem Ziberov, a Russian born kid and his friend Shadi Adi Najjar. As you can imagine Shadi is apparently not Irish. They were however Honor students and Ziberov was quite literally a Boy Scout. The news report from AP indicates that Najjar was believed to have robbed the girlfriend of one of the killers. It also sounds like tragically Ziberov was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, perhaps accompanying his friend Najjar to what turned out to be a set-up.<br />
<br />
As for the killers. Well they say pictures are worth a thousand words<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivLuQ1gq1PAv8SJni-L6Hhra1o-gledrgGoEMFJU-ByRtzc4xSlnUVO2uwuHNIi0ooycLbkS1O05PYv0iV8Gw_TZKeEmOe6gZxDTal2ij2qa8ITomEUROSeHEylgr_-jt41CBGFmXWWLZh/s1600/student_murders_185.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="637" data-original-width="1484" height="171" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivLuQ1gq1PAv8SJni-L6Hhra1o-gledrgGoEMFJU-ByRtzc4xSlnUVO2uwuHNIi0ooycLbkS1O05PYv0iV8Gw_TZKeEmOe6gZxDTal2ij2qa8ITomEUROSeHEylgr_-jt41CBGFmXWWLZh/s400/student_murders_185.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Nice.<br />
<br />
Clearly a trio of upstanding citizens who fired around 30 rounds, according to police, to kill a presumably defenseless 17 and 18 year old. Of course if the rumors are true, the 17 year old upstanding Honor student Najjar was also a thief who stole an iPad from a girl and dragged her 50 feet down a road behind the same car he was later murdered in.<br />
<br />
What would have been so unbelievable to our parents is not the crime itself, although growing up this sort of thing just didn't happen very often. It would be that a suburb of our nation's capitol was the scene of a shooting of a Muslim teen and a Russian born teen who were murdered by three Hispanics and likewise would be amazed that it is so commonplace. As our White population is replaced by Hispanics, Muslims, blacks and various Asians, they bring with them the sort of social maladies that made them want to escape to America in the first place. This is happening in Europe but on steroids and the feminized European populace keeps rolling out the welcome mat in the hopes that if they bend over sufficiently the nice Muslims and Africans will suddenly stop being third world animals and suddenly become upstanding Danish, German and French citizens. At least in the U.S. we sort of tried to fight back in electing Trump but as he cucks at every turn, most notably on immigration and the wall, it is likely we are hearing the death rattle of the American experience. Our liberal (as opposed to progressive) representative democracy is not suitable for third world invaders who don't see America as a place to go to become American and work hard for the American dream. It is a giant piggy bank full of White people's money and they are all carrying hammers.<br />
<br />
Would European settlers and generations of White citizens have worked so hard, sacrificed so much, shed their blood, to build this nation if they knew that their descendents would show their gratitude by handing over everything they built to third world invaders to rape and pillage without so much as a whimper? I doubt it. This nation wasn't built as a home for Garcia's and Yanez's and Najjar's. These people have made a mess of their own homes so they waltz into America, flop on the couch and demand that Americans provide them with food, shelter and money. White Americans are being squeezed out bit by bit through immigration and low birthrates. Go to college, spend a decade finding yourself, then when you are in your 30's you might start to settle down just in time for women to be nearing the end of their natural fertility. That is the message we are inundated with but we are told it is the key to success and prosperity. What it really is the key to is childlessness, enormous debt, dead-end jobs, expensive fertility treatments to replicate the natural fertility squandered for a decade on selfishness and ultimately White genocide.<br />
<br />
The only places in this world worth living in are either historically White nations or rigidly homogenous Asian countries. What happens when those are overrun or die out thanks to failure to reproduce, which seems to be where Asian nations like Japan are headed. When Somalia and Saudi Arabia and Mexico swallow up the United States, Canada, Australia and Europe, where will Whites go? Who will maintain Western civilization?<br />
<br />
The answer is nowhere and that should frighten and anger every White person to take action but I won't hold my breath waiting.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-58165005119064428922017-06-18T09:55:00.002-04:002017-06-18T09:55:56.367-04:00Black Pigeon On Black PantherI like YouTuber <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/TokyoAtomic">Black Pigeon Speaks</a> and watch most of his videos. He wouldn't pass many ideological sniff-tests from the alt-right but still he posts interesting and often useful links, in spite of his weird anger toward religion. He fired up a new one today on the upcoming Black Panther movie and why it should actually appeal to the alt-right.<br />
<br />
This seems weird at first. Looking at Tweets referencing "Black Panther movie" is a litany of people explaining why this is the greatest movie ever, even though it doesn't come out until next year. One person, Nomaris Garcia Rivera, wrote perhaps the most unintentionally hilarious piece that wasn't intended as satire when she posted: <a href="http://culture.affinitymagazine.us/the-black-panther-trailer-shows-what-africa-would-have-been-if-white-people-didnt-destroy-it/">The ‘Black Panther’ Trailer Shows What Africa Would Have Been If White People Didn’t Destroy It</a>. Yep. According to her:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>That right there in just two minutes drops the trope of defenseless Africans who need help and shows what African countries could have been without its colonization. Where instead of showing a story of a white hero who comes to aid the people it shows those who have hidden their culture to keep it safe.
</b></blockquote>
Wow, she gets that all from a trailer. We wuz superhero kangz! A two minute trailer unravels the historical reality of Africa and what has happened anywhere blacks employ self-rule (i.e. Haiti, Liberia, Detroit...). You can't make this stuff up. But BPS makes the point in this video that the movie really makes the case the alt-right makes. Here is the video:<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/POZCF9t9FUI?rel=0" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
White nationalism is at the core about self-determination. I don't want to harm or enslave blacks or Hispanics. I am all for each ethnicity, race and religion having their own homelands. If blacks think they would be better off in their own homelands, I agree! That is at the center of black nationalism just as it is at the center of White nationalism. The idea that blacks would live in some utopia if only the White man had left them alone is obviously and demonstrably false but if that is the fantasy they believe, more power to 'em!<br />
<br />
I support the creation of a real Wakanda where blacks can be free to rule themselves as they see fit in Africa. I would just ask that Whites are afforded the same privilege.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-77269140768907013582017-06-11T10:41:00.002-04:002017-06-11T10:41:51.980-04:00If The Noose Doesn't Fit You Must Acquit!<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdBOfo_ar_94vOiHFgv7nf4dHVyYUOul1nLiK3XBw1yPgCGHFxQo1shDuJntzoI2RwXGZs-uyWLIyHRuTxMk1lC6PzQWtbioEfhnkV4zorgavYuXwYQtSVNjcTQ5XBkn3XzTEO2O75x9G9/s1600/OJ.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="493" data-original-width="740" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdBOfo_ar_94vOiHFgv7nf4dHVyYUOul1nLiK3XBw1yPgCGHFxQo1shDuJntzoI2RwXGZs-uyWLIyHRuTxMk1lC6PzQWtbioEfhnkV4zorgavYuXwYQtSVNjcTQ5XBkn3XzTEO2O75x9G9/s320/OJ.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Remember that moment in the O.J. trial when Johnny Cochrane said of the infamous gloves "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit!" The O.J. trial was a seminal cultural event. A famous black man, known for his joviality, was accused of murdering his beautiful estranged White wife. The trial itself was televised, as was the famous white Bronco car chase which so many of us watched in morbid fascination. This was before the endless barrage of "news" but the nation was riveted by the spectacle. It was just a few years after the Rodney King trial and the riots that filled our screens. We watched over and over as gangs of black men burned down their neighborhoods and dragged White trucker Reginald Denny from his truck on live TV, beat him, hit him in the head with a brick which nearly killed him, and then danced and cavorted around so proud of what badsses they were for assaulting a man outnumbered 6-1 who was just trying to do his job. During the O.J. trial the prosecution, as inept a group of lawyers as you are likely to see this side of a sitcom, decided to have Simpson try on the infamous bloody leather gloves, even though they were soaked in blood with the expected result to the leather of making them far less supple and Simpson was wearing latex gloves. Of course they didn't fit. Predictably the jury acquitted Simpson and I recall that day at work when the verdict came down on the TV in the breakroom and how excited many of my co-workers were, all White women if I recall, that O.J. was set free.<br />
<br />
That isn't really the point of my post. My point has to do with a recent event that follows a very predictable pattern of "hate crimes" that are splashed all over the media for a few days and then disappear, very often later being shown to have been hoaxes. There is a nice resources that compiles a <b><a href="http://fakehatecrimes.org/">list of fake "hate crimes"</a></b> that is worth bookmarking because you can be sure the media will do their best to bury stories about "hate crimes" shown to be false. The story of the soon to be shown as fake "hate crime" hits the media, is denounced by the talking heads as a sign of "how far we have to go" and then gets buried, the mission of moving the conversation accomplished. As an example, the black church in Mississippi that was spray painted with pro-Trump graffiti and burned down, that was later predictably shown to be a black member of that very church, still has the news about the arson on their church webpage and says it is unsolved. I wonder how much they received in insurance and in donations from guilty White Christians to rebuild the church one of their own burned down?<br />
<br />
In this case, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/01/noose-found-inside-smithsonians-african-american-history-museum.html">a noose was found in the National Museum of African American History and "Culture"</a>. Don't feel bad if you had no idea that this museum even existed, it wasn't built for you. It is a place for Washington elites to wallow in racial guilt and for visiting blacks to be dosed with a healthy serving of racial resentment to take back home. The response was typically over the top.<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>The gallery containing an exhibit on segregation was closed
for about three hours while U.S. Park Police investigated the incident in the
nation's capital, Smithsonian officials said.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>"The Smithsonian family stands together in condemning
this act of hatred and intolerance, especially repugnant in a museum that
affirms and celebrates the American values of inclusion and diversity,"
Smithsonian Secretary David Skorton wrote in an Institution-wide email.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>Museum founding Director Lonnie Bunch III said in a statement
that the incident is a reminder of the challenges African-Americans still face.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>"The noose has long represented a deplorable act of
cowardice and depravity — a symbol of extreme violence for African Americans,
..." Bunch said. "This was a horrible act, but a stark reminder of
why our work is so important."</b></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
They <b>closed</b> the whole museum down for <b>three hours</b> because of a noose. What did they think was going to happen? Did they think it was going to explode? Did they think that a posse of Klan members was going to ride in on horses and start lynching colored folks? Do Irish people run screaming in fear when they see a potato? The list of dangers to the lives of blacks goes on for quite a while, past lightning strikes and being eaten by a shark, even past dying in an exploding White House during an alien invasion, before you get to "getting lynched at a museum in the middle of Washington, D.C.". So why the overreaction? It gets more curious. A few days after the initial report I saw this story from a local D.C. Fox affiliate: <a href="http://www.fox5dc.com/news/259101788-story">Investigation continues after noose found at DC's African American museum</a>. In it the question is raised, why are there no suspects? Why haven't we seen video of a perpetrator? Check this out:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>A noose was found by a tourist inside the segregation gallery at the Smithsonian Museum of African American History and Culture on Wednesday afternoon. Since it was discovered, there have been reports that surveillance video was recorded inside the gallery, but officials have yet to release any details on what might have been captured on tape.</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>On Monday afternoon, a museum official told FOX 5's Kristyn Leon they have "no interest in sharing the video," but didn't say why. Earlier in the day, another museum spokesperson said it's part of protocol to turn over any surveillance video that might exist to police as part of the investigation process. In this case, the spokesperson also said they're not even sure that video of the person or person who hung the noose inside the museum's gallery even exists, and the couldn't talk about what was on the video that has been turned over to U.S. Park Police.</b></blockquote>
Huh. In this day and age of surveillance cameras everywhere, there doesn't seem to be a tape forthcoming. After such a dastardly crime, leaving a noose on the floor!, why isn't there a suspect? Why hasn't the tape been released to the public to find the perp, as is such a very common practice for an unsolved "crime"? It almost sounds like there is a tape, they know what is on it but for <b>some reason</b> they don't want to release the tape because maybe what it shows is embarrassing.....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-5lPknCE_-8cQ33ZJSUcAug-AOhRx7vl-x_NW1wsPLZLBVgyltvCXnSP4SREFpFpjEZMO4xJv6RCeaf3qS4rC_6m9K6_-yik5FNar3WukPzB97NM2V0i7lsKVL4hIfrkWFT5TeXxUSEPp/s1600/hoax.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="400" data-original-width="400" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-5lPknCE_-8cQ33ZJSUcAug-AOhRx7vl-x_NW1wsPLZLBVgyltvCXnSP4SREFpFpjEZMO4xJv6RCeaf3qS4rC_6m9K6_-yik5FNar3WukPzB97NM2V0i7lsKVL4hIfrkWFT5TeXxUSEPp/s320/hoax.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
It isn't like this didn't get any press coverage. A search of the Washington Post ("Democracy Dies In Darkness!" That just kills me every time I see it) for "noose museum" yields 76 results, each more outraged and self-righteous than the last. Missing however is any news about a suspect or a description of the perp. Just that something outrageous happened and by God we are outraged about it!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIPz1Y06CLFynLJi-XHqS26guwJ5vaUOwnqWFgt_SN8Mfc8-lg6V9eNIpvJD27hYBoFq5hxfZweiDG5JqF4nRgSyQdYGIcg7tyNq1oancYKjCGp8J3QtcocxmXPs-KhR7GpiMq5l9K7QRR/s1600/noose+abuse.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="981" data-original-width="956" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIPz1Y06CLFynLJi-XHqS26guwJ5vaUOwnqWFgt_SN8Mfc8-lg6V9eNIpvJD27hYBoFq5hxfZweiDG5JqF4nRgSyQdYGIcg7tyNq1oancYKjCGp8J3QtcocxmXPs-KhR7GpiMq5l9K7QRR/s400/noose+abuse.JPG" width="388" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br />
So what gives? I frequent a lot of online circles full of people that would fall into the category of alt-right or White nationalist or even the alleged "White supremacist" bogeyman, which I really haven't run across. The people I read are mostly interested in an ethno-state for Whites, like the Jews have in Israel and not much different from what black nationalists desire, and preserving Western culture and our race itself rather than oppressing or dominating blacks or Mexicans. I can't imagine any of them leaving a noose somewhere when they can just post whatever they like on social media. Like the "racist" notes found at St. Olaf College planted by a black student who ironically was headed to Europe after graduation, this smacks of a hoax and the utter lack of any suspects or video just strengthens that assumption.<br />
<br />
Why would someone do this? Let's go back to a quote from the first story:</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>"The noose has long represented a deplorable act of cowardice and depravity — a symbol of extreme violence for African Americans, ..." Bunch said. "This was a horrible act, but a stark reminder of why our work is so important."</b></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
That is why.<br />
<br />
Racism, persecution, oppression, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, soon to be joined to pedophilia, are cash cows, they are their own industries. The problem with their industry is sort of like any other industry, there needs to be constant demand. Do you think it is coincidental that roads that were just repaired start to crumble thus requiring the same industry that repaired the road to come back in the next year and repair it again? Or that computers become obsolete and start to break down almost immediately? I am more than 90% sure that this is a hoax and I would absolutely not be surprised if the museum knows it is but they aren't saying anything because the news story is useful for fund-raising and drawing in more guilty White D.C. liberals to boost attendance numbers.<br />
<br />
Actual lynchings, rare as they were, were horrible and that is not what I am for nor is it what anyone outside of a few kooks are for. Hoax hate crimes like this just muddy the waters to the point that many people, and more everyday, just assume that reports of "hate crimes" are a hoax until proven otherwise. That doesn't stop the people trying to dismantle the West and eliminate the White from using them because a fake hate crime is just about as useful to them as a real "hate crime", maybe more so because they can more easily manage the story.<br />
<br />
This is the real struggle we face. Ours is a fight where we try to rely on facts and data and reason (plus the very dankest of memes and trolling) but the opposition relies on emotion, misinformation, careful spin and outright lies. When people defend fake hate crimes because after all it could have happened, it makes the task that much more difficult. The general complacency, inability to think rationally and decades of racial self-loathing pounded in the heads of most Americans increases the difficulty exponentially. Regardless of how difficult the task is and how tilted the playing field is against us, we must continue to fight. Nothing less than the very existence of Western civilization, the greatest experience in human history in spite of its flaws, and the continued existence of our race are at stake.</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-59144113469678201802017-06-10T11:51:00.001-04:002017-06-10T11:51:09.844-04:00WelpSo real life as it were kept cropping up and other blogging ventures have kept me busy. It was obviously not my intent to go dark after such a short time but things like that happen. I am really hoping to get more active starting pretty much right now!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-43057319559149194512017-02-09T11:09:00.000-05:002017-02-09T11:09:40.025-05:00Gee, Why Does The Alt-Right Have So Much Momentum And Energy?It is not just the clever memes and Twitter trolling, or the violence against alt-right people peaceably expressing their opinions or even the Youtube videos or Gab conversations. I think a lot of it has to do with the general sense of growing anger at the barrage of crap being dumped on White people in this country. For example...<br />
<br />
Exhibit A, the trailer for the new Netflix black revenge porn series "<a href="http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/02/08/netflix-releases-first-trailer-dear-white-people-tv-series/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social">Dear White People</a>". The video is very brief but in that short time is incredibly offensive for the stereotypes of White people, who apparently all live in opulent fraternity houses and wear blackface paint and appropriate black "culture". You will note that in the video you see a horde of blacks storming a White frat house, pushing White kids around and destroying their property. Is that the message being sent to Whites, don't make the blacks angry or offend them or even just be yourselves or you might find a crowd of blacks breaking into your home and pushing you around and breaking your stuff? The backlash against the video is pretty severe, threatening to send it into serious competition with the Ghostbusters remake for most disliked video in history. Since I saw it this morning at around 82,000 dislikes it has climbed to over 105,000 dislikes and is still climbing. Nice marketing Netflix!<br />
<br />
Exhibit B, I <b><a href="http://alt-rightrising.blogspot.com/2017/02/white-working-class-just-replace-em.html">posted earlier</a></b> about neo-con Bill Kristol cavalierly suggesting that the solution to the problems in the White working class is to simply replace them, like with Mexicans who really want to work hard and create a better life for their kids. Makes perfect sense to me, clearly no one in the White working class actually works hard or wants a better life for our kids. We all just sit around "cutting coupons" in between taking hits of prescription painkillers or meth. For Kristol the American people, specifically the very people who created and sustained this nation, built our cities, defeated the Nazis and Imperial Japan, sent a man to the moon, etc., are nothing more than replaceable economic units of production. I happen to think they are people who deserve more than to be cast aside for Mexicans.<br />
<br />
Exhibit C, Under-Armour is going to invest $5.5. billion in majority black hellhole/shooting gallery Baltimore but <a href="http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/2017/02/elected-official-in-65-black-baltimore.html">that plan is called "white supremacy"</a>. Yes, trying to invest money in a city that is majority black and crime-ridden (funny how those go together), a plan that will create all sorts of jobs for construction, on-going employment and additional jobs in restaurants and other industries that spring up where other jobs exist, is nothing but the Man keeping the brothers down by...providing gainful employment. Obviously this is just a ploy to get blacks to work at real jobs instead of shooting each other while waiting for a reparation check.<br />
<br />
Exhibit D, the Hispanic woman governor of New Mexico, Susana Martinzez the only female Hispanic governor in America, is called a racist by a scrawny beta-male "white" liberal because she supports making it <a href="http://www.kvia.com/news/new-mexico/susana-martinez-only-us-latina-governor-denounces-claim-she-is-racist/317185393">more difficult for people in this country illegally to get a driver's license in New Mexico</a>. Clearly an effete White guy knows more about the Hispanic experience in America than Governor Martinez who obviously doesn't know anything about being Mexican-American: "She is a former Democrat and grew up in a Mexican-American household near the U.S.-Mexico border.". As a spokesperson for the Governor pointed out "...the overwhelming majority of Hispanics in New Mexico supported her initiative to end the dangerous practice of giving driver's licenses to illegal immigrants". Obviously those majority of Hispanics who support this policy are also racists. What would we do without milquetoast guilty White liberals to tell us what to think?<br />
<br />
That is just a brief survey of a couple of items in the news from the last day or so. We are bombarded with this crap all day, every day and I see more and more people who are just sick and tired of it. If trying to invest in a city that desperately needs investment is White supremacy and if entertainment companies think putting forth black violence revenge porn is what consumers want to watch, is it any wonder more and more people are finally so sick of the narrative that they are giving the alt-right and other race realists a fair hearing and realizing that what we say makes a lot of sense?<br />
<br />
Please keep it up Netflix and Bill Kristol. You are doing a lot of the hardest work for us.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-63643510992538535572017-02-09T03:59:00.003-05:002017-02-09T03:59:59.081-05:00White working class? Just replace 'em!In one of those examples of why in a world where every person carries a recording device and the internet allows those recordings to be broadcast to the world instantaneously you need to watch what you say, Jewish neo-con Bill Kristol opined that the White working class is kind of struggling but that is probably because they are lazy and just into hanging on by clipping coupons, which Kristol seems to think is a sign of decadence and decay rather than being frugal. In fact the White working class are so worthless and failing to contribute that it would be best to just get rid of them and replace them with Mexicans, as if the American people are nothing more than economic units that can be interchangeable and as if new waves of White immigrants 100 years ago are the same thing as waves of Mexican immigrants today. White people not working as much as you want? <a href="https://www.amren.com/news/2017/02/bill-kristol-lazy-spoiled-white-working-class-replaced-immigrants/">Get rid of them and replace them with Mexicans.</a> Whatever you need to do to keep the worker bees working. As quoted from American Renaissance:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Look, to be totally honest, if things are so bad as you say with the white working class, don’t you want to get new Americans in? Seriously, you can make the case—this is going on too long and this is too crazy, probably, and I hope this thing isn’t being videotaped or ever shown anywhere. Whatever tiny, pathetic future I have is going to totally collapse.
</blockquote>
Here is the clip which I am sure AEI would love to get removed from Youtube:<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mWJSKhEwjy8" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
Bill seems to have a pretty low opinion of White people but if someone were to suggest that since the Jews are struggling with terrorism in Israel maybe we should just replace them with Palestinians, you can imagine the cries of anti-Semitism and the invocation of the Holocaust. For the record, I am not recommending replacing Jews with Palestinians.<br />
<br />
Maybe for people like Bill Kristol, Whites are just another cog in the machine that can be replaced and have America keep chugging along as before. What he doesn't seem to understand is that you cannot replace the people and the culture that made America a nation where he and his family have become rich and influential with a different culture and expect things to go on as they were before. There is a reason Mexicans keep leaving Mexico, they don't like living somewhere that Mexicans dominate. There is nothing magical about the soil on this side of the Rio Grande that will make Mexicans who move here suddenly turn into the Founding Fathers. Instead it is more likely that the more Mexicans move here, the more America will look like Mexico which is precisely the place Mexicans seem to want to get away from. The same is true with Muslim "refugees", the more you bring into America, the more those parts of America where they live will start to look like the places they fled from. We already see this in Europe but that doesn't stop people in this country from pretending that passing through customs in an American airport makes people magically adopt American values.<br />
<br />
It seems to me more likely that Kristol sees the White working class backlash against the Washington establishment, and by proxy the Jewish neo-con power brokers who are out of power, as a betrayal of his idea of the Republican party of endless interventions in the Middle East. The nomination and election of Trump was in a part a giant middle finger being given to the neo-con establishment and so those White working class voters who elected a Republican need to being eradicated and replaced because the unspoken flip side of his replacement equation is that in order to replace the White working class you need to not only bring in Mexicans to increase their numbers, you need to reduce the White working class population. Thanks to low birth-rates, higher incidences of White births out of wedlock, mixed race babies replacing White babies and the drug and suicide epidemic that plagues White working class communities, that part of Kriston's Final Solution for Whites is on the right path.<br />
<br />
Instead of replacing the White working class with Mexicans and Muslim "refugees", maybe we should try to adopt policies in this country that encourage and revitalize White working class communities, starting with immigration reform, closing the borders and reducing the number of people we bring here to replace White workers. Stop providing incentives for the White working class to emulate the black underclass in joblessness and social pathology. It will take time but the people of America, those same White working class people Kristol wants to get rid of, are what built this country and made it great in the first place. Suggesting that we can just replace them when they become inconvenient is exactly why Trump was elected in the first place and why people stopped listening to Jewish neo-cons. Trump for all of his faults and foibles has the interests of the White working class as a top priority. Kristol and his ilk don't. It really is just as simple as that.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-10440465629353104572017-02-02T21:40:00.001-05:002017-02-02T21:40:20.927-05:00Glenn Beck Is An Entertainer, Not A Serious Thinker Nor A Friend of LibertyIt kills me that some people who think of themselves as "conservative" and lovers of liberty still listen to moonbat Glenn Beck as if he is on our team. Let's be clear, the only team Beck is on is Team Enrich Glenn Beck. He is a more than slightly deranged member of a cult who sells his voice and for some reason people take him seriously. Exhibit A, Beck's response to the riot last night at Berkeley:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<div dir="ltr" lang="en">
I have already defended Milos right to speak.But be clear on who he is.:Alt-right mouthpiece who promotes chaos. Rioters on left just as bad</div>
— Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) <a href="https://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/827029042243055616">February 2, 2017</a></blockquote>
<br />
<script async="" charset="utf-8" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>
Right. I defend Milo's right to speak but I also draw a moral equivalence between his speech that people don't like and rioters who burn stuff, pepper spray girls and beat people unconscious. Notice the words he used again: Rioters on left <b>just as bad. </b>How does someone who commits criminal acts of vandalism and violence that could have killed people only qualify as "just as bad"?<br />
<br />
Here is a hint for self-proclaimed Constitutional expert Glenn Beck: free speech and free expression is expressly protected in the Constitution. Criminal vandalism and violence against people you disagree with is not. That isn't really that hard to understand if you have a middle-school level reading comprehension.<br />
<br />
I don't have any particular affinity for Milo. Like I have said, he is occasionally amusing, he is provocative and he makes the right people mad but he is hardly a leader of the alt-right. However I have even less affinity for Glenn Beck, a lunatic snake-oil salesman who says whatever the political winds that are blowing on any given day in order to sell ad space on his radio show, memberships for his website and of course his books that I am pretty sure are mostly written by other people.<br />
<br />
If you consider yourself a serious thinker and a defender of liberty but you still listen to Beck, you don't understand those terms,Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-38037852414588840102017-02-01T20:00:00.000-05:002017-02-01T20:00:01.761-05:00If You Drink BudweiserA) You should be ashamed of yourself because it is terrible and probably tastes better after it has passed through your urinary tract.<br />
<br />
B) You should stop because clearly Anheuser-Busch thinks that selling crappy, cheap beer gives it license to smack you in the face with their clumsy virtue signaling.<br />
<br />
Check out this silly Budweiser ad that is about a subtle as a jackhammer.<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HtBZvl7dIu4" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
Didja get that subtle message? Oh, see if Trump had been President, Adolphus Busch wouldn't have been able to come to America and we would be forced to drink monkey urine instead of "The King of Beers". Of course Busch came here in 1857 and came here legally and was not from a nation that was known for fomenting terrorism. So other than that, it is <b>just like</b> the current debate over illegal aliens and a temporary freeze on "refugees". Does A-B think that the people who drink Budweiser, who probably voted overwhelmingly for Trump, are going to appreciate the suggestion in this video that they are terrible people?<br />
<br />
If you want to drink a beer that is not so concerned with virtue signaling and clumsy appeals to the coastal elites that wouldn't be caught dead drinking their "beer" anyway, try <a href="http://t.co/mwZBLCmqGW">Yuengling</a> which got all sorts of crap for an endorsement of Trump last fall.<br />
<br />
The King of Beers. What a joke.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-23199584674740373002017-02-01T15:24:00.002-05:002017-02-01T15:24:54.978-05:00Immigration and Self-DestructionIt is generally the case that on any given topic from abortion to the merit of using fabric softener, the Left in this country can be counted on to respond to any and all issues with a toxic mixture of a complete lack of logic, jaw-dropping stupidity and tearful hysteria. Actually, scratch the word "generally", there are no known exceptions to this statement.<br />
<br />
The latest case in point, skipping for the nonce the nomination last night of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court which is causing all sorts of overwrought reactions, is the very reasonable and probably far too lenient and temporary restriction on travel to the U.S. from states that are known hotbeds of anti-Western terrorism and the general chaos that accompanies Islam, especially where it is found without the slightly civilizing influence of lots of oil money. The wailing and crying from people like life-long Jewish politician Chuck Schumer, who seems oblivious to the fact that the people he wants to import into America in massive numbers also hate his guts for being a Jew and many would gladly toss him off of a building, is silly and wildly ignorant. I have found very, very few people on social media, even from normally thoughtful if misguided people, that have taken the time to think through these questions at even the most basic level. Let me throw a little something out there....<br />
<br />
In general the refugees and illegal immigrant laborers of this world come from either Muslim countries or countries that are predominantly black or Hispanic. You probably have noticed that at the present no one is talking about building a wall to keep Canadians from crossing our borders, although given the idiot who is Prime Minister currently that might be a topic for the future. The simple fact that refugees and illegal aliens come almost exclusively from nations that share one or both of those attributes is without question. That brings us to the next point. There must be <u>something</u> about those nations that generates so many refugees and illegal aliens. This is where the liberal mind breaks down. They simply cannot take that next step. "We need to help the black and brown refugees" is where they stop without ever wondering why all of the refugees are black and brown in the first place.<br />
<br />
The second point is that almost all of these refugees who are able to do so are heading for countries that also share some common characteristics. They tend to head for countries that are, or at least used to be, predominantly White and at least nominally Christian. Countries like the U.S., Germany, England, Sweden, etc. share a common heritage and offer the refugee and illegal alien a wealth of advantages over other nations that demographically and culturally are similar to what they are trying to flee from.<br />
<br />
In other words, people from black and brown and/or Muslim dominated nations are desperately trying to leave the company of other people who look and/or believe like they do and go to countries where people don't look and don't believe as they do. The culture is different, the religion is different, even the climate is different and yet you still have Somalians moving to tropical paradises like Columbus, Ohio and Minneapolis.<br />
<br />
What is up with that? Either one of two possibilities must be in play here. Either they are heading for these countries under false pretenses in order to wage jihad, which many of them clearly are, or there are fleeing their own nations and the company of their own people because being in a nation that is White and nominally Christian beats being in a country that is black or brown and/or Muslim.<br />
<br />
Here comes the next leap. If there are valid reasons for wanting to go from one culture and move at great risk to another culture, it means that the receiving culture is superior in some ways, enough so that leaving your homeland is worth it. Saying something like that is absolutely forbidden in our "enlightened" society but that doesn't make it less true. They aren't trying to come to America because they think their lives will be worse here but because they think their lives will be better and that is because the make-up and culture of America and Europe is better than the same in Africa, the Middle-East, Mexico, Cuba, etc. People don't flee Somalia to go to Yemen. They don't leave Mexico to go to Columbia. They leave nations that are full of people like themselves to go to nations full of people not like themselves because the people not like themselves have built a better place to live than people like themselves.<br />
<br />
Look at a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_by_country#Table">listing of nations by highest percentage of Muslims</a>. You have places like Afghanistan, 99.8% Muslim, where former 13 year old child "brides" are raped, beaten and have their ears and noses <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4179952/Former-child-bride-EARS-hacked-husband.html">cut off by their "husbands"</a>. Iran (99.7%), Iraq (98.9%), Yemen (99%), "modern" Turkey (98.6%). Would any sane person voluntarily leave the U.S. or Finland or the Netherlands and move to one of those countries? I would rather be in prison in America than live in a place like Afghanistan or Iran. I don't want to move there and since I am a Christian and not afraid to say it, they don't want me there and would probably express their displeasure by cutting my head off.<br />
<br />
The next leap.<br />
<br />
What happens in places like the United States, Norway, France, etc. when the people who have the culture and characteristics of places they wanted to flee from start to become more and more culturally dominate in the places they fled to? We already see this in Scandinavia where absorbing thousands of "refugees" has made places that were once safe completely off-limits for Whites, especially women. The result is the place you moved to doesn't make life better for you in the long run, instead your presence and refusal to assimilate makes the place you <b>fled to</b> as bad as the place you <b>fled from</b>. That is not going to happen soon in the majority of the U.S. because of the sheer mass of people and the general difficulty of getting here from Africa and the Middle East (unlike Mexico) but it is already happening in Europe in smaller nations and we see it happening here in places like California and Texas as they fill up with Mexicans and the White birthrate continues to drop like a stone.<br />
<br />
It is a crude and probably racist analogy but throwing a bar of soap into a mud puddle doesn't make the mud puddle cleaner, it just makes the bar of soap dirty. The Bible teaches that a little bit of leaven leavens the entire loaf (1 Corinthians 5:6) and the more you forcibly cram people who are from backwards nations into advanced nations, the greater the impact. Our refugees and illegal immigrants are not enhancing our culture, they are degrading it and turning parts of America into mirror images of the very places they are fleeing from. That doesn't help them nor is it compassionate and it is harmful and destructive to the very aspects of America and Europe that make refugees risk death to flee there in the first place.<br />
<br />
This sort of logical progression in thought escapes the emotion-driven, "muh feelz" denizens of the American Left. They never think beyond the next five minutes and never seem able to think more than one step into a proposed solution. As a result we get people who think that a 3 month <b>temporary</b> ban on a very select, targeted set of nations with obvious security issues is somehow a human rights disaster. Trying to explain the thought process above to liberals is usually a waste of time because they lack the critical thinking skills to even consider it. Thus it is the responsibility and duty for those of us who care about this country and our traditional heritage to pass those critical thinking skills on to our children (which assumes we will have children in the first place).<br />
<br />
If you want to actually help refugees and people who are disadvantaged in other countries, you should first consider the needs of people in this country and also that this country is $20 trillion in debt, a debt that will cripple the economy of our children. Second, if you are so inclined you really ought to think of ways to help them where they are. Foremost among this would be to stop meddling in foreign affairs which increases the instability of those countries and creates a sense of "you break it, you buy it" responsibility to "fix" the nations we broke. Letting people with a shared identity and a shared culture control their own destiny rather than piggy-backing on that of another people is far more compassionate. Self-determination is part of what made America great and we shouldn't seek to take that away from people from other countries to "rescue" them. Instead let them forge their own destiny. If all cultures are equally valuable and all people are essentially equal in ability, and that is what we are told over and over, then they should be able to do just fine on their own without Western imperialism hindering their growth. Of course logic and history undercuts that theory but that doesn't obligate the U.S. and Europe to become precisely the sort of places these people are fleeing from in the first place.<br />
<br />
You can't improve the lives of people by permitting them to replicate their social malformations in new and exciting places. We need to be firm in defending what makes our nations and our culture the envy of the world and encourage other nations to forge their own path forward instead of opening our borders to their citizens. We have an obligation, I might even say a sacred obligation, to preserve our culture for our children and that is more important than suicidal gestures that clearly have never been thought out.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-57802901582153544002017-01-28T22:22:00.002-05:002017-01-28T22:22:37.833-05:00There Goes Grumpy Uncle Pat, Making Sense AgainAs someone who grew up watching Pat Buchanan on political talk shows and then slowly starting to back away from him because he was just a little too extreme, it is now kind of humbling that he keeps being right all the time. When everyone else was writing off Trump, Buchanan was still banging the drum for The Donald. I used to snicker a little when I read his stuff, that Pat is just so out of touch!<br />
<br />
Now he just keeps on making sense and it is kind of irritating. He is like the grumpy uncle who comes to family get-togethers and rants about politically incorrect stuff and is generally embarrassing but keeps being right. In his latest piece <a href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/buchanan/what-a-wall-says-to-the-world/">What a Wall Says to the World</a> he writes:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
It is not only that illegal migrants take jobs from Americans, that they commit crimes, or that so many require subsidized food, welfare, housing, education, and health care. It is that they are changing our country. They are changing who we are.<br />
....<br />In 1960, we were a Western Christian country. Ninety percent of our people traced their roots to Europe. Ninety percent bore some connection to the Christian faith. To the tens of millions for whom Trump appeals, what the wall represents is our last chance to preserve that nation and people. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
To many on the cosmopolitan left, ethnic or national identity is not only not worth fighting for, it is not even worth preserving. It is a form of atavistic tribalism or racism.</blockquote>
Not only is (White) ethnic or national identity not worth preserving, it is a moral obligation for the Left to destroy it. What Pat fumbles here is that the Left doesn't hate <b>all</b> ethnic or national identity, just White and European ethnic identity. I get that he can't or at least won't say that at places like the American Conservative, although he implies it, but I am quite sure he knows this to be the case. I don't know if the wall will do what we hope it will but I do know that it is better than not doing anything at all while illegals overrun entire cities and eventually entire states.<br />
<br />
It is not just a wall on the Mexican border but also includes the need to manage who comes to this country in general.<br />
<br />
I wish more people would look at Europe and see what happens when the tiny Muslim population suddenly grows and starts feeling their power and expressing their resentment toward the very people who have given them shelter. Sure 100,000 extra Muslims in a country the size of the U.S. can kind of blend into the background but as we keep letting them in pretty soon they start to take on self-identity that is opposed to the land they live in. Dearborn, Michigan is a prime example where Muslims have a sizable population and are already trying to create a Muslim environment in the midst of America.<br />
<br />
A nation without a concrete identity and without borders is a nation that is doomed. Do we really want to take everything that makes America a place people want to live and others want to come to and throw it away?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-92081060883098926342017-01-28T09:00:00.000-05:002017-01-28T09:00:15.184-05:00The SJWs Are One Of The Best Recruiting Tools We HaveRod Dreher writing at paleo-con journal <i>The American Conservative</i> posted something I found fascinating, <b><a href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/creating-the-white-tribe/">Creating The White Tribe</a></b>. It is basically two comments from TAC readers that express exactly what I have found in my own experience and journey, that the constant White bashing by the Left is pushing many people who formerly would never have even entertained some of the ideas of the alt-right to start giving them serious thought. This is from the second excerpt (emphasis mine):<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I remarked to my wife a couple of weeks ago that witnessing the left’s histrionics for the past several months has made me more racist, more sexist, and more homophobic than I ever would’ve been otherwise. Now, I don’t like that about myself, and I try to self-critique and keep in check some of the more knee-jerk impulses (I must strive for Christian charity above all else, of course), but that’s obviously way more than the left is willing to do. <b>What the left doesn’t get is it’s turning people like me—reasonably moderate, go-along-to-get-along types—into full-blown reactionary radicals. Ideas that I once would’ve rolled my eyes at I’m now willing to give a hearing.</b> I don’t think I’m some paragon of rational thought and self-control by any means, but it concerns me that if I’m willing at least to entertain some of these ideas (critically and deliberately), what about the people who embrace them more impetuously or because their circumstances seemingly leave them no other option? <b>If the left wants to make this all about tribes, I’m siding with my own tribe.</b> That means the Church above all else, of course, but it may come to mean some of those other categories, too. What follows from all of this cannot bode well.</blockquote>
Boy, that sounds familiar! I want to re-emphasize that second bold line above:<br />
<br />
<b>If the left wants to make this all about tribes, I’m siding with my own tribe.</b><br />
<br />
Unilateral disarmament in this cultural struggle can only end in a diminished White race and eventual functional elimination of Whites as a distinct people. For some people that is a worthwhile goal but I think if push comes to shove, an honest answer from most White people would categorically state that this outcome is bad for them, their family and the world.<br />
<br />
I am seeing more and more of this, people starting to ask questions and make statements that as recently as 3-4 months ago would have been unthinkable. To paraphrase Admiral Yamamoto, the SJWs and the "Women's March" have awoken the sleeping giant of White America.<br />
<br />
We cannot be content to just allow our culture and even our people be eradicated. I hold little hope for the Trump presidency as a stand alone success because of the erratic personality of Trump but the election itself and especially the post-election response has done more to awaken White America than almost any other catalyst. The question now becomes how we respond to those who, like some of Rod's readers (and for every two who write in I bet there are hundreds more silently reading and watching), are starting to give a serious hearing to our ideas. We might never get another shot like we have now and if we blow it because we are too concerned with being clever or edgy or if we spend all of our time on in-fighting and territory struggles we could miss this opportunity and consign Whites to the ash heap of history. If that happens we will only have ourselves to blame.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-21841426821258327842017-01-27T21:36:00.001-05:002017-01-27T21:36:41.572-05:00The "What Would We Do Without Illegal Mexicans" FallacyThe topic of immigration reform and enforcement is one that generates a lot of noise and not a lot of rational thought. What about the poor children, the families "ripped apart" (because of the illegal actions taken by the adults)?! Christians in America have a Gospel obligation to support illegal immigrants coming here and staying here (no we don't)!<br />
<br />
Perhaps the most obscene lie we are told is that we absolutely need these Mexican and other illegal immigrants because they "do the jobs Americans won't do". If we didn't have illegals, who would pick our veggies and cut up steers in meatpacking plants and care for our landscaping and clean our offices? This is a great tactic, even if it is dishonest, because you get to suggest a greater work ethic for illegals and imply that current American citizens are too lazy to do certain jobs.<br />
<br />
It is pretty clear that the U.S. does not suffer from a lack of low-skilled employable people to fill low-wage and less desirable jobs. While it is true that we are woefully unprepared to replace a lot of skilled trades jobs in the future thanks to the "everyone has to go to college and get a four year degree" nonsense, it is absolutely not true that there simply are not enough people to do the jobs that the illegal aliens do.<br />
<br />
For example, under the gross incompetence and criminal malpractice of the Obama administration, we have seen a plummeting of the workforce participation rate. Granted some of this is due to a ballooning population of older Americans who are in retirement but by any measure there are just a lot of able-bodied Americans who are not in the workforce.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_fRCoArLs-4_VzrjRT2qgWQiwVTnAuLsjVRpXW_Ef5_486nP3oodxvgN2R5lBlxHRcVjo_5fwEpEfxfaGCaQpp6ZuPi6ZT1opBlH1R0HAY6i0jDEEehrh2f9OevRhRrzraMVy6Vtl1NE8/s1600/wfp+jan+2017.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="262" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_fRCoArLs-4_VzrjRT2qgWQiwVTnAuLsjVRpXW_Ef5_486nP3oodxvgN2R5lBlxHRcVjo_5fwEpEfxfaGCaQpp6ZuPi6ZT1opBlH1R0HAY6i0jDEEehrh2f9OevRhRrzraMVy6Vtl1NE8/s400/wfp+jan+2017.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
I wish this were because more mothers were staying home to raise their own children rather than subcontracting the often thankless task of parenting to others. It is not. There were tons of reports about a startling and dangerous trend that made the news in 2016. The New York Times published a story in October titled <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/17/opinion/millions-of-men-are-missing-from-the-job-market.html">Millions of Men Are Missing From the Job Market</a>.<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>Economists have long struggled to explain why a growing proportion of men in the prime of their lives are not employed or looking for work. A new study has found that nearly half of these men are on painkillers and many are disabled.<br />
<br />The working paper by Alan Krueger, a Princeton economist, casts light on this population, which grew during the recession that started in 2007. As of last month, 11.4 percent of men between the ages of 25 and 54 — or about seven million people — were not in the labor force, which means that they were not employed and were not seeking a job. This percentage has been rising for decades (it was less than 4 percent in the 1950s), but the trend accelerated in the last 20 years.
</b></blockquote>
Think on that for a second. We have more than one out of every ten men of prime working age, between 25-54 which mostly eliminates college students and early retirees, some <b>seven million men</b> who are not doing anything and not <u>trying</u> to do anything. This is more significant than the unemployment rate which essentially covers people out of work but looking. These men are not even looking for work. That is an average of 140,000 per state. Many of these are probably on disability, and many of those legitimately so, but according to this report a lot are also hooked on painkillers.<br />
<br />
So we have tens of millions of Americans of working age who are not working. I would be willing to bet that even when you allow for people who are legitimately disabled and those who work outside of the normal employment world and don't show up in the numbers, there are still millions of Americans out of work.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, we have an explosion in the welfare state. It is without question that the number of Americans and the percentage of the population that are at least partially dependent on the government for some or all of their livelihood is growing. I would say it is also obvious that this is intentional but that is a different topic for a different day. According to a <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/terence-p-jeffrey/354-percent-109631000-welfare">2014 story from cnsnews.com</a> in 2014 over 100,000,000 Americans were receiving some form of welfare:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
What did taxpayers give to the 109,631,000 — the 35.4 percent of the nation — getting welfare benefits at the end of 2012? </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
82,679,000 of the welfare-takers lived in households where people were on Medicaid, said the Census Bureau. 51,471,000 were in households on food stamps. 22,526,000 were in the Women, Infants and Children program. 20,355,000 were in household on Supplemental Security Income. 13,267,000 lived in public housing or got housing subsidies. 5,442,000 got Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. 4,517,000 received other forms of federal cash assistance.
</blockquote>
We have that many people who are on assistance of some sort but we are told that we need illegals because they do the jobs that "Americans won't do"? It makes sense that if people were not being provided with an incentive to <b>not</b> work they would be more willing to do jobs that illegals do because they wouldn't have much choice otherwise. People make choices all the time. If I am given the choice between a steak and ham sandwich, I am usually going to take the steak. If someone else is offered a choice between staying home to play video games while receiving government benefits or losing those benefits and having to earn a paycheck working in tough conditions in a meat packing plant, which do you think they will choose? I wouldn't choose that, for me work is part of my identity and I was raised to see work as something to be sought out, not avoided, but that is yet another example of what happens when we try to manage a nation using one set of principles (the European Protestant work ethic for example) when that nation has a large population that doesn't believe in such guiding principles.<br />
<br />
So I don't care to hear that we need Mexicans to do work that American won't do. Americans <b>will </b>do those jobs if you take away the incentive for them to not do those jobs and in doing so they gain both valuable work experience as well as a sense of pride (hopefully). I know plenty of Americans who will do whatever they need to do to provide for their families. If I had no other choice I would cut up hogs or pick vegetables or clean office buildings if that is what I had to do to provide for my family, a sacred obligation and privilege I have as a father and husband. I would imagine that many other Americans who share a similar background would do the same.<br />
<br />
We don't "need" illegal aliens to do the jobs Americans "won't do". We need to eliminate the means by which so many American seem to think that they can sit on the sidelines while the rest of us work to support them and while people violate our laws to work in their place. If the lower class constituency of the Democrats suddenly find themselves competing with illegals for jobs that they need to pay for rent, food and other necessities, I guarantee you the immigration conversation in this country would change dramatically.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-43101157624863958202017-01-24T13:27:00.001-05:002017-01-24T13:27:48.927-05:00Shut Up White People!At the DNC Chairman candidates forum, some guilty, militant quasi-White broad named Sally Boynton Brown says her job is "<a href="http://www.vdare.com/posts/dnc-chair-candidate-my-job-is-to-shut-other-white-people-down">shut other white people down</a>" when they have an opinion. That comment drew applause and nods of agreement. Tell me again two things:<br />
<br />
a) Do Democrats ever want another White person to ever vote for Democrat candidates? Clearly not. Their entire political strategy is to pack the U.S. with non-White voters and get them to vote Democrat with the promise of "free" stuff paid for by White tax-payers. Wealthy White liberals who can afford to live in gated, guarded communities will be fine but the rest of White America will be left at the mercy of others, told they have to pay for every service and be grateful for the privilege.<br />
<br />
b) Why should White people think that trying to placate racial minorities will ever lead to harmony when it is clear that only complete capitulation and self-subjugation by White people with ever satisfy the forces of multiculturalism?<br />
<br />
If we don't stem the demographic doomsday coming soon, there will cease to be a voice for Whites in America and those of us who remain will be bled dry, financially at first and literally at some point.<br />
<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LDOdcsh435Q" width="560"></iframe>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-37182873925135755562017-01-23T21:31:00.001-05:002017-01-23T21:31:38.471-05:00A Bit About MeI figured it wouldn't hurt to put some basic information about me to give the rare reader that accidentally stumbles onto this page some insight as to where I am coming from. Hopefully as my writing improves and I get on more solid footing more people will intentionally come here to read my ramblings so I expect this to be a "living document" as I work out what I am pondering and I plan on moving this to a perma-linked location.<br />
<br />
Without divulging too much in the way of personal information, I am a middle-aged White guy who lives in the Midwest and I have been married for quite a while. We have a large family, more than pulling my weight in the quest to stave off our impending demographic disaster.<br />
<br />
Here is why I am as of right now on some issues of note. I am still in the process of forming my positions on some of these areas that I previously didn't permit myself to think too deeply about.<br />
<br />
<b>Faith</b><br />
<br />
Nothing really matters more to me than my faith. When I identify as a Christian, I don't mean that I go to church on occasion or that I was "baptized" as a baby or that I mark "Christian" on surveys. I mean that I approach every topic via the lens of Scripture and my faith must inform everything I believe. I not only own a Bible (actually quite a few of them), I also read it regularly.<br />
<br />
This has also been my biggest stumbling block to work through as I begin exploring topics of nationalism and racial identity. This is way to complicated an issue to bullet point but it is something I have thought a lot about, well before I started blogging in this new venue. In short I think that a lot of the common platitudes thrown around in Christian circles on issues of race are driven by poor exegesis, general Biblical illiteracy and heaping helpings of misplaced White guilt.<br />
<br />
<b>Race</b><br />
<br />
Believe it or not, I don't hate anyone. That makes no sense in our culture. Unless you bow and scrape at the altar of multiculturalism, you obviously hate everyone. Regardless of the dichotomy of unquestioning acceptance and obsequiousness versus outright hatred that our culture demands we accept and form every conversation through, I simply don't hate people because they are a different race or ethnicity or religion. I can <b>prefer</b> the company of people I share a common heritage and common values with and not automatically hate people who do not have that in common with me. I can also dislike aspects of other groups without hating them and even say that some cultures are superior to others in objective ways. None of that is hate.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 12pt;">Racism is the contemporary boy who cried wolf.
When <b>everything</b> and <b>anything</b> is racism, pretty soon most people see <b>nothing</b> as
racism because it is a meaningless term. In fact the result has been the precise opposite of what the public intent of pummeling the American people with White self-loathing and collective guilt is supposed to lead to. Instead of creating a perfectly flaccid society that </span><span style="font-size: 16px;">stands</span><span style="font-size: 16px;"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">shame-faced in line to pay reparations to people who were never slaves by people who never owned slaves, this constant drumbeat has instead made people so tired of being called a racist that they stop believing it. I am prime example of this. </span>By indirectly calling me a racist over and over the forces of forced multicultural compliance have
actually immunized me from caring about it and now I feel free to speak my mind
because it just doesn't matter if leftists think I am a racist. In other words, if they are going to call me a racist no matter what I do, unless I abandon every shred of dignity and intellectual honest, then why should I care what they think at all? Hunter Wallace put it well in his post, <a href="http://www.altright.com/2017/01/17/the-real-racists-suffer-from-negro-fatigue/">The Real Racists Suffer From Negro Fatigue</a>:<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Rod Dreher’s readers are clearly suffering from an advanced
case of Negro Fatigue. What is the diagnosis of Negro Fatigue, you ask? It
isn’t *hating* black people so much as it is a feeling of exhaustion. It’s like
you tried and you are done. More than anything else, it is a feeling of total
indifference among White people to whatever radical black activists like
Ta-Nehisi Coates or John Lewis are agitating about on any given day. Are you rolling
your eyes when you hear ‘Civil Rights Icon’ John Lewis or ‘Civil Rights Leader’
Rev. Jesse Jackson? If so, you are coming down with Negro Fatigue.<br />
---<br />
John Lewis & Co. have maxed out the ‘racism’ card. They have spent their moral authority. It won’t be transferable to the next generation of ‘civil rights leaders’ like Ta-Nehisi Coates, DeRay and Talcum X Shaun King. White America has too much Negro Fatigue after eight years of Barack Obama. The Alt-Right is only the canary in the coal mine.</blockquote>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
That is pretty accurate. Many, many White people have long instinctively understood that blacks and Whites are different, just as Asians and Hispanics are different from us and from each other. We also largely know that there are some pretty troubling and common characteristic among blacks, including a propensity to crime, especially violent crime, lower average IQs, serious issues with lack of impulse control, a willingness to take from society rather than to contribute, and on and on. When I was younger we talked about these issues rather openly, if in an admittedly less than subtle and nuanced fashion but as we have grown older these issues, which are still at least as serious and common, are shoved into the shadows so that it seems perfectly reasonable for the Department of "Justice" to focus on alleged police misconduct and abuse of power in Chicago (which undoubtedly exists as it does in every manifestation of the Federal government) while at home White people read about the DOJ report and wonder why the primary concern is not blacks murdering each other by the hundreds. Of course we don't say anything out loud. Even in my own home for the longest time we would often make a comment when blacks were predictably involved in some heinous crime and then sort of try to pretend we didn't actually say anything at all.<br />
<br />
All that to say that while I don't hate anyone for their race or ethnicity or religion, not hating them does not require me to unreservedly and enthusiastically embrace everything about them. I do expect to write a lot about race because it is the biggest divider and the most serious issue we face, even after 8 years of a (half) black President or perhaps it is more accurate to say <b>because of</b> 8 years of a (half) black President. The normalization of sexual deviancy is a close contender in second place but race is still the greatest issue, not least because the shifting demographics in the U.S. mean more racial tension in the coming years while there is only a finite pool of perverts, homosexuals, pedophiles, etc. although I will grant that they are increasingly bold, vocal and capable of extreme viciousness.<br />
<br />
One last rather sweeping statement. I am increasingly convinced that the various races, especially blacks and Whites, inhabit different worlds while supposedly living in the same country and that this cannot be solved by diversity training but rather by accepting and embracing our differences even to the point of being separate from one another.</div>
<br />
<b>Immigration</b><br />
<br />
Like virtually all Americans, I come from a family of immigrants, in my case, as is the case with most White Americans, European immigrants. My family and my wife's family came here in the 19th and 18th centuries. They came here on boats, legally and in the light of day. They learned English and worked and raised families. They did not sneak into this country, hiding from the authorities because they knew they were breaking the law.<br />
<br />
Immigration is a multi-faceted issue. I am all in favor of creating very serious, criminal penalties for employing illegal aliens, perhaps a very stiff penalty for each alien in your employ the first offense and then 30 days in the local jail for the second offense. I guarantee that meat packing plants would stop hiring illegal aliens in a heartbeat if the managers and HR staff were facing a month in jail and a felony conviction on their record for doing so. The flips-side is the difficulty in stopping border crossers who often get sent back again and again with no consequences or who end up in detention centers on the American tax payer's dime for extended periods.<br />
<br />
One of the biggest obstacles to keeping illegals out of our country is the seemingly endless supply of low paying jobs that "Americans won't do" so there is always demand for these illegals. In fact it is often stated that since Americans "won't do" these jobs, cracking down on immigration means no tomatoes for American consumers, no landscaping around homes or businesses and Chicken McNuggets that cost $10 per nugget. What I have always found weird is that we have all of these jobs that Americans "won't do" but we also have millions upon millions of Americans that we pay to not work at any job at all. How many men and women sit on the couch collecting government benefits and yet would laugh in your face if you suggested working in a work environment like a meat packing plant? It seems to me that if we a) have a high demand for certain kinds of jobs, so high that people risk arrest, deportation and even death to come get those jobs and b) we have an enormous surplus of labor that is currently doing nothing, both problems cancel each other out and solve themselves.<br />
<br />
I don't know of anyone even remotely serious that is suggesting that we halt all immigration or that we send back people who recently legally arrived here. The immigration position most people seem to advocate is that we get serious about screening people we allow to come here, enforce the law for people who have overstayed their permit and be sensible in the numbers of people we allow in. This is a sovereign nation with legal borders, a nation allegedly founded on the rule of law. People who have as their first act in this country willful law-breaking have no place in America. I am not sure what to do about people who keep coming back repeatedly after being deported. I know what I would like to do about it but that would probably be considered inhumane.<br />
<br />
<b>The "Jewish Question"</b><br />
<br />
This is a tough one because I haven't done enough research on it. I know that the JQ is supposed to be a make or break issue for a lot of people on the alt-right, etc. but it interests me less than questions of race realism, the ethnostate, immigration control, etc. Part of my issue is that as a generally conservative, patriotic American and especially as a conservative Evangelical Christian, the Jews are supposed to be our greatest friends. Israel can do no wrong, the Jews are God's chosen people, etc. For someone to question the disproportionate influence of Jews on Western cultural institutions or to suggest that maybe Israel is occasionally too heavy handed is tantamount to shoving a little old Jewish lady into an oven.<br />
<br />
Like I said this is one that I haven't had as much time to think about compared to race and immigration.<br />
<br />
<b>Family and Gender</b><br />
<br />
The "nuclear family" or traditional family or whatever you call it is one of the foundations of the White European society and culture. As it has imploded so has our culture. While the Negro social structure has been a dumpster fire since well before Daniel Patrick Moynihan's infamous report, more and more we are seeing White Americans adopting the same pattern of single mothers, deadbeat dads, generational dependency and general sneering dismissal of the importance of family. Girls raised by single mothers getting knocked up and becoming single mothers, grandparents raising grandkids, etc. are all symptoms of a sickness in our culture. Make no mistake, this is not unintentional. The effort to dumb down our society, to emasculate men and de-feminize women, to subsidize behavioral choices that were culturally shameful a few generations ago, the effort to separate children from the influence of their parents by storing them in government run propaganda camps/feedlots called public school and pushing moms into the workplace, all of this is a program designed to rot the core of our cultural foundations. Having said that, the greatest force for undermining the family is not public schools or atheism or feminism. It is self-emasculating men who refuse to lead their families. We have men like that, simpering and soft men who creep around our society and their own homes like house elves at Hogwarts, in spades. We need more men who act like men, like husbands and like fathers.<br />
<br />
If the Alt-Right fails to champion the White family, it will be doomed to be just another flash in the pan movement.<br />
<br />
Gender is not something malleable or subject to personal choice or whim. It is the most basic biological fact as even a cursory study of the natural world would confirm. Likewise human sexuality is clearly defined, and is binary. With rare physiological mutations aside, there are men and there are women. The basic survival and perpetuation of humanity depends on this, it is how we were created and how we flourish. Homosexuality, transgenderism, pedophilia, the entire universe of sexual deviancy that denies basic human created sexuality and replaces it with perversions that at their essence deny the created order subvert and degrade the essential building blocks of European culture and it is therefore no surprise that family and traditional human sexuality are areas of life most under assault by the progressives and globalists who want consumer sheep instead of free men and women.<br />
<br />
This is why I don't get the infatuation about Milo. Milo is amusing because he is so un-PC and makes liberals nuts because he is a protected class but I can't see how embracing him serves the cause. He is sort of like a court jester, he makes us laugh now and then but you wouldn't want him to marry the princess (or prince in this case). Anyway, if we lose the White family, the party is over. A culture with lots of White degenerates is not sustainable and not remotely appealing.<br />
<br />
<b>The Ethnostate</b><br />
<br />
This is more of a placeholder because I need to think a lot more about this issue and read a lot more before I can start to make a reasonably informed opinion on it.<br />
<br />
So that is just a few of my initial thoughts. More to come!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-67564984032715355742017-01-22T10:17:00.000-05:002017-01-22T10:17:19.185-05:00After We Deport The Illegal Aliens We Should Deport The "Celebrities" Washed up slut-rocker Madonna was out trying desperately to show she is still relevant after all of these years at the Angry Liberal Chick Stampede For Abortion And Lesbianism yesterday in <strike>Sodom</strike> Washington D.C. Her entire claim to fame over the years came from being overly dirty and skanky, a talented singer who rose to fame and fortune not because she was talented but because she mixed her talent with tawdry lyrics and suggestive music videos. White middle class girls in the 80's could feel rebellious and naughty by listening to her music, just like White middle class boys in the 80's felt tough and edgy by listening to rap from N.W.A and Ice-T. Over the years she has become increasingly irrelevant as new pop tarts out slutted and skanked her, first singers like Britney Spears with her school girl outfits and then Miley Cyrus who performs simulated (I think they are simulated) sex acts on stage. At 58 and charging fast toward 60, Madonna can't keep up because she is just too old and unattractive these days so she resorts to the old female celebrity stand-by, shrill political comments. Yesterday she said something that if Toby Keith had said when Obama was inaugurated (did you know he was our first black President? Probably not, no one ever mentions that), Keith would have ended up in jail:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House. But I know that this won't change anything."
</blockquote>
So she doesn't blow up the White House, not because it would be wrong as the White House belongs to the American people and murder and property destruction is wrong, she doesn't bother because it wouldn't change anything. Gotta hand it to those progressives, they are so incredibly tolerant!<br />
<br />
The contrast in media coverage is predictable. Just a google search of "Madonna" gives you this (as an aside, I feel like I should open an incognito window and get a penicillin shot afterward if I am going to google Madonna):<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEginNvIGCEh0JG-MjxUpf3oWDePx33grjQ4jcPnfc7xrscrovDzYbHHbr0Z3oEDIla7S-xoBlXjOFVoiNyvEibumBch7ZxybKt0t8TxBlnZsNDo-qE7fsaz66UQKzO00JjNNyjhbKstugAY/s1600/old+skanks+never+die.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="85" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEginNvIGCEh0JG-MjxUpf3oWDePx33grjQ4jcPnfc7xrscrovDzYbHHbr0Z3oEDIla7S-xoBlXjOFVoiNyvEibumBch7ZxybKt0t8TxBlnZsNDo-qE7fsaz66UQKzO00JjNNyjhbKstugAY/s400/old+skanks+never+die.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Yes, very powerful Rolling Stone. It is obviously edgy and brave to say exactly what people who adore you want to hear.<br />
<br />
This comes after the Inauguration itself where thugs and unemployed nobodies with nothing better to do struck a blow for democracy by breaking some windows and <a href="http://www.altright.com/2017/01/20/richard-spencer-from-altright-com-talks-about-being-sucker-punched-by-a-tolerant-leftie/">sucker punching Richard Spencer</a> before running away. Nothing says brave freedom fighter like some neutered "man" wearing a mask, hitting someone who isn't looking and then running away before Spencer knew what happened. Joke is on that guy, nothing he could have done would have given Richard more free publicity and probably a lot of page hits than hitting him on camera. It is weird how virtually all of the violence during the last election came from peaceful progressives and was inflicted on violent, intolerant people on the Right.<br />
<br />
On the other hand President Trump tweeted this message this morning:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<div dir="ltr" lang="en">
Peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy. Even if I don't always agree, I recognize the rights of people to express their views.</div>
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/823174199036542980">January 22, 2017</a></blockquote>
How odd. I thought Trump and his supporters were a threat to democracy and yet they are the ones being attacked in the street, <a href="http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/01/21/one-anti-abortion-group-womens-march-brutal/96895552/">women being spit on</a> and attacked by other "women" at a "Women's March", people throwing stuff at ball attendees or punching people in the streets or breaking windows and setting cars on fire.<br />
<br />
If I didn't know better, I might think that Trump and people on the Right, from neo-cons to Alt-Right folks, were the ones who were engaged in civil debate over actual ideas and the open-minded, tolerant, intellectual progressives were the ones trying to cause civil unrest and overturn the results of a perfectly legal election. That can't be the case though as everyone knows progressives are kind and loving and people on the right are all just wannabe Nazis.<br />
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-82387065625075452822017-01-21T21:39:00.003-05:002017-01-21T21:39:58.876-05:00THIS. IS. WASHINGTON!OK this is just funny<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://i.imgflip.com/1i009l.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="223" src="https://i.imgflip.com/1i009l.gif" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-64691997509844663832017-01-20T18:47:00.000-05:002017-01-20T18:47:03.198-05:00Good Bye and Good RiddanceI freely admit that 8 years ago I watched Obama take the oath of office and felt a little thrill of assuaged White guilt. Look kids, our first black President! That has worn off as I realized that a) I don't have any responsibility for slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, etc. and as such I don't have any collective guilt and b) that events of the past are complex and in no way excuse terrible behavior today or change simple facts.<br />
<br />
What I also know now is what became readily apparent very soon after Obama took office and has been our reality ever since. He has been an unmitigated disaster for the United States and there are lots of dead brown people in the Middle East and dead black men in Chicago who probably aren't hugely impressed with hope and change.<br />
<br />
Just fiscally, our debt is nearly doubled and about to pass $20,000,000,000,000 and in return for that we get crappy education, a billion rules from self-important career bureaucrats, a ton of new food stamp recipients. Nothing was done to address the unfunded mandates or runaway spending or bloated, self-preserving bureaucracies.<br />
<br />
He has emboldened perverts and deviants of all stripes. When he took office, men who sodomized other men for recreation were not able to get "married" nor were butch women who hated men able to do the same. Deviants men who liked to dress like women being able to use women's locker rooms and bathrooms wasn't an issue. If Hillary had replaced him, who knows what perversions would have been mainstreamed next? Pedophilia? Polygamy? Bestiality? The sky would have been the limit for the sexual fringes.<br />
<br />
His incompetent and incessant meddling in foreign affairs gave us the spectacle of Benghazi and four dead Americans left to die horrible deaths. The "Arab Spring" has replaced dictatorships with chaos. Thanks to Obama and his sycophantic buddies in European capitols, the homeland of White European Americans is being overrun with hordes of Muslim infiltrators who are making it unsafe for White women to walk the streets in many cities and still Obama clamors for more. We have thousands of troops still in Afghanistan and Iraq and who knows where else fighting and dying a holding action until the inevitable surrender and return to power of the Taliban and other Islamic terrorists.<br />
<br />
Lawlessness runs rampant in many of our cities as criminals have become emboldened by Obama's rhetoric. Black lives, we are told, matter but only if those lives are lost in the very rare occasions when a White cop shoots the black men, and typically that happens while the black man in question is armed and/or in the middle of the commission of a crime. Obama's hometown is a war zone with a couple of murders on average each day.<br />
<br />
Race relations in general in this country are at a low point since the "Civil Rights Era". Far from a unifier, Obama proved himself to be a divider and a champion for reducing the White majority. We were badgered with White guilt and accusations of racism at every turn.<br />
<br />
All in all, the last eight years have been a horror show for real Americans and especially for White men. I don't know for sure what the next four years hold for America and particularly for White men in America (i.e. the people who built this country) but it certainly can't be any worse.<br />
<br />
Good riddance to Barack Hussein Obama, the man who did the unthinkable and toppled Jimmy Carter from his perch as the worst American President in modern history.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-90595788335380202382017-01-16T14:54:00.000-05:002017-01-16T14:54:44.616-05:00The Delicious IronySo you might have noticed that today is Martin Luther King Day. It is also the launch date of <a href="http://altright.com/">AltRight.com</a>, the new/relaunched venture of Richard Spencer, Daniel Friberg and Jason Jorjani. I am sure it is just a happy coincidence that this happened on MLK Day....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrrpwBTJY4UWrxZjG4vmhRa5Zqb2RiPQlJB7Pf1yW55kBY_9m7u7SyYxgW3_lJynFwb9GlsW_qm8TFtPvK_5XPtn06RqRL_XgfuajV9ItGTAwOyGfEtYuoeVOYpUr1bHdg07k57pmG1dk2/s1600/pepe.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="390" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrrpwBTJY4UWrxZjG4vmhRa5Zqb2RiPQlJB7Pf1yW55kBY_9m7u7SyYxgW3_lJynFwb9GlsW_qm8TFtPvK_5XPtn06RqRL_XgfuajV9ItGTAwOyGfEtYuoeVOYpUr1bHdg07k57pmG1dk2/s400/pepe.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6942061128558347782.post-87954419883678515772017-01-16T09:00:00.000-05:002017-01-16T09:00:24.012-05:00Our Multicultural High Holy Day Arrives!It is <a href="https://infogalactic.com/info/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._Day">Martin Luther King, Jr. Day</a> in America and all good Americans are duty bound to post some variation of a handful of safe and inspiring quotes from "Dr." King to show how aware they are of the pervasive nature of racism, and by implication their own guilt even if they have never discriminated against a black, and they absolutely cannot mention how irritated they are that the mail is not delivered, the banks are closed and their kids are not in school.<br />
<br />
In America you can criticize anyone. You can be critical of the pope. You can be critical of the President, even to the point of fomenting insurrection and denying the electoral process like "Civil Rights Icon" John Lewis. You can be critical of entertainers and of sports figures, political figures and clergy.<br />
<br />
You cannot be critical of Martin Luther King, Jr.. <b>Not ever.</b> You cannot bring up his alleged but pretty well documented marital infidelity. You cannot mention his proven plagiarism on his doctoral dissertation (thus my scare quotes around "Dr." when referring to King. If he had been White, he almost certainly would have faced some serious academic sanctions). You cannot bring up his calls for an early version of reparations. You can't bring up his quotes that talk about race riots and <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/04/what-martin-luther-king-thought-about-urban-riots">excuse the violence</a> with "Yeah they are bad...but...racism." You cannot talk about his anti-capitalist positions. No, all you can really do is post quotes from his "I have a dream" speech, as if that is the only thing he ever said and is most representative of his thought. I actually prefer the unfiltered MLK. I think he was mostly wrong on most issues but at least the unfiltered King is a real person, not this phony media creation that can do no wrong. The real King was a reasonably intelligent guy and a pretty powerful orator but was deeply flawed as a person and tragically wrong on many issues. Even worse is the way his legacy has been monetized and exploited by his sycophantic "friends" following his death.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPxJSPxw98oVnN_gocDHoTVFCxXthIbIX6S9UP5g9zO3PFek1HKOzZYrKVuHzJNQLXJmrFVACO2rHUORtrhvMhxhBvR495H5KlH2IH_8rSgFtsPgkxx6bqYQ-IrOuIQQ-OZwcHWdO9Txa1/s1600/greyhound.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="177" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPxJSPxw98oVnN_gocDHoTVFCxXthIbIX6S9UP5g9zO3PFek1HKOzZYrKVuHzJNQLXJmrFVACO2rHUORtrhvMhxhBvR495H5KlH2IH_8rSgFtsPgkxx6bqYQ-IrOuIQQ-OZwcHWdO9Txa1/s320/greyhound.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
I wonder what Mr. King would think today? Would he still be blaming black crime rates on racism? Would he be like so many other race hucksters today who think that even though we have a (half) black President for another week, the guy who has been President for 8 years in America, racism is still the primary reason blacks are poorer and more prone to violent crime? Would he think that naming <i>just one more street</i> after himself or putting <a href="http://alt-rightrising.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-us-treasury-has-solved-racism.html">a Negress on a gold coin</a> that most black women can't afford and will never see (I can't afford one either, even if I were so inclined to buy one) is going to somehow make things better? I doubt it. The rhetoric used by King and perfected by his carrion eating successors is based on "goals" that are intentionally amorphous enough that you can never actually attain them. This is by design. If you are always chasing the rabbit of "equality" that you will never, ever catch, knowing full well that people have never been equal anywhere, at any time in history, you can squeeze money from other people, productive people, without end. It is a perfect racket. People like Al Sharpton and Jesse "I cradled MLK's head in my lap while he died" Jackson have been milking guilty White Americans for decades, using guilt and extortion to leech hush money from Whites while at the same time doing absolutely zero to help their own people. Why should they help blacks? Every black who becomes self-sufficient is one less black they can marshal in boycotts or marches or riots. In other words, a self-sufficient black is of no use to them and is actually a hindrance. I would hazard a guess that people like Sharpton and Jackson were secretly kind of bummed when Obama became President because it meant they would have to work a lot harder to keep the "White man holding us back so he owes us money" narrative going and if there is anything Jesse Jackson hates, it is having to work.<br />
<br />
So while I loathe the murder of King for a bunch of reasons, I also don't think that if he had not been assassinated we would see a lot of difference in America. There is simply too much money to be made by perpetuating the "racism is the cause of all of our problems" narrative. I am convinced that most of the social tension that we hear about and react to in the mainstream media is largely ginned up and to find out what is really happening you need to follow the money. That is also why we only get a carefully scrubbed and sanitized media creation of King. He is far more useful and of course far more profitable as a dead martyr to be molded and shaped into a money making machine than he ever could have been alive and talking.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08129181499884634830noreply@blogger.com0